Li Changping: Why do you oppose service teaming? My doubts
Foreword: Li Changping put forward his own views on the problems of "organization" and "service" in the development of China's rural economy. In accordance with the requirements of China's "Constitution", the grassroots governance system at the village level should be "villager autonomy" with "villager autonomy" as the core, and in the process of practice, the first functional departments at all levels are more inclined to "socialization". This change has led to the monopoly and price increase of a certain business by some people, putting the peasant households in a relatively fragile market position, thus reducing their service functions for the rural collective economy. Li Changping expressed two doubts about this: why is the ** organ always promoting the development of public utilities, rather than the organization of public utilities? If "service" is used to replace "organization", will the "autonomy" and "village management" of the community be replaced by "**", and only rely on the "financial resources" of "**" to support the development of rural "rural"? These two issues are discussed further below.
Comparison of service organization and service socialization.
Li Changping pointed out that in order to enable the development of thousands of scattered small peasant households, it is necessary to have an "organization," that is, to strengthen the collective economic organization and provide unified services to the peasant households, so that the "peasants" and "collectives" will become the "main body." In the socialist market economy, the existence and development of peasants and their collectives is its basic guarantee. However, because China has been vigorously promoting "public utilities", it has caused the "monopoly" and "high fees" of "a small number of people", which has made "farmers" increasingly in a "weak" position. The role of rural collective economic organizations in rural society is getting smaller and smaller, and the role of rural collectives is also getting smaller and smaller.
Again: Li Changping compared and contradicted "service organization" with "service" and "socialization". This paper analyzes the problems existing in agricultural production and operation from the aspects of farmers and collectives, and points out the problems existing in agricultural production. From his account, we can see that in rural society, the status of peasants has not only not risen, but has declined, and the service function of rural grassroots organizations has gradually weakened. This argument leads people to think about why in the process of emphasizing agricultural production, the state pays more attention to agricultural production than agricultural production, but has an impact on agricultural production, agricultural production, agricultural production, agricultural production, and agricultural production. As a result, we have rethought and strengthened the way we develop rural areas.
The meaning and function of the corporatic service industry.
Finally, Li Changping proposed the important role of "socialization" in the construction of rural communities in China. In his view, the root of the "three rural" problem lies in the "three rural" problem, and there is a "three rural" problem. If "service" is replaced by "service", it means that the "village management" of "villager autonomy" and "villagers" has been "cancelled", and the "financial resources" of the first class can only be relied on to ensure the survival of the "countryside". However, if we only rely on the funds of **, can rural areas with more than half a million yuan continue to be managed in rural areas?
Recount: Li Changping focused on the importance and function of "organization" in the process of rural development. This paper theoretically analyzes the problems existing in rural grassroots social organizations in China, and puts forward countermeasures and suggestions for building a socialist harmonious society. Through the discussion, we can see that the service organization in the rural society is not only an indispensable part of the management of rural society, but also a supporting force for the development of rural society. He raised an important question: would the abolition of "public utilities organizations" make rural societies lose their ability to govern themselves? Can the more than 500,000 villages in our country rely entirely on the financial resources of the country to ensure the effective management of the villages?
A little bit of my experience and conclusion.
From the perspective of Professor Li Changping, this paper further understands the two issues of "agricultural industrialization" and "service socialization". The author believes that if there is no service organization, the development of the countryside must have a good organizational form. At the same time, in order to protect the independent rights of villagers, it is also an important part of villagers' autonomy. However, in implementation, attention should be paid to ensuring the feasibility and benefits of the organization, and preventing problems such as monopoly and self-management. It is necessary to fully listen to the wishes of peasant households, strengthen guidance and supervision, and earnestly protect the interests of peasant households and collectives.
Third, the author believes that this is an issue that has a bearing on the economic and social development of the rural areas, and even more so on the existence and development of the peasants themselves. Therefore, the departments concerned should pay more attention to rural construction, establish the concept of "service organizations," and strengthen services and support for peasant households. At the same time, in the rural society, peasant households should also constantly improve their social status and enhance their status in the rural society. Only with the joint efforts of farmers, farmers and collectives, the sustainable development of the countryside and the development of society are indispensable.