Eating directly and taking cards, embezzlement, or not being measured, and eating ugly are all taboos.
If this is the only way to gain private gains, then smart leaders would rather not do anything and live only on their salaries.
At worst, this is a great risk to individuals, and at worst, it is extremely destructive to the whole society and public interest, and it is harmful to the overall socio-economic ecology.
However, the reality is that through precise and meticulous path design and risk control, it is feasible to legally realize private interests within a reasonable range under the premise of greatly improving public well-being and implementing the intentions of the parent organization.
This is not greed, this is the optimal allocation of social resources to achieve a win-win pattern of social economy and individuals. The leaders above the country and the common people win big, and the individual side can win a small win.
First of all, under the current general trend (such as ecological and environmental protection), under the premise that the superior has formed a normative guidance document, will we take advantage of the trend to promote the use of major projects and major funds in line with the spirit of the document.
Second, the province resolutely does not use the subject of cooperation, even if the province has the most suitable subject. It is better to resolutely use those from other places, especially the central enterprises and state-owned entities.
Thirdly, the track is selected, and its business model, technology, and qualifications must be highly irreplaceable. The cooperative entity should be highly well-known and well-known, in short, it must make everyone have nothing to say, especially the state-owned entity that has no choice but to make potential parties with conflicts of interest.
Finally, take a step back three years and start cashing out with the gloves (he also has a fair share of it, and not all of them are taken away, which is due to him), and he will never touch it during his tenure or for a few years back.
Cashing in on the market-oriented path, preferably the overseas market-oriented path, and there can be no capital path that violates the market. Wear and tear is inevitable, but as long as safety is ensured, it is necessary and worthwhile.
There are a few more points:
1) Equalization of interests: The interests above a certain scale are not their own problems, but the problems of the entire network. In case of particularly important interests, I can only cooperate, and the main beneficiaries must be the private interests of the key leaders at the higher levels.
2) Priority for foreign investment: Policies and decision-making give more room for operation, and many foreign companies themselves also have a lot of differentiated competitiveness, that is to say, if it is pure market competition, it should also win. In this case, it is more convenient for me to follow the trend.
3) Risk isolation: the behind-the-scenes promoter (decision-maker) and the direct ** person (glove) have one-line contact, and do not meet or contact in any public place.
The other partners don't know who the promoter behind the scenes is, they only know that the gloves can get things done, and our interests are packed with the trust of HK BVI CAY to penetrate into the territory and participate in important business as an investor.
4) Shipment in batches: start planning before and after the retreat, and start to ship in batches from small to large in the third year. To be exact, this is a tax issue, as long as the tax-related matters are dealt with, it is equivalent to completing the legal exit.
The judging criteria for our win: as long as you don't go in, it will be counted, even if you are relegated, pure double opening is not handed over, and you can cancel or reduce your retirement benefits, etc., you will win.
Resource integration, resources, entrepreneur thinking, Liu Haocun, social practice.