Do you have any sellers around you who like to pick wool?
I have a few such friends around me, they are also cross-border sellers, and they also like to use the bugs of various platforms to get a wool, and they are often complacent.
But yesterday, one of the friends saw a news on the Internet and instantly said that he would never dare to mess with the wool of the platform in the future.
Let's take a look at the screenshot of the news sent by this seller.
This is a case just announced by the Ningbo Procuratorate in ZhejiangShao, a cross-border e-commerce seller, took advantage of the cooperation loophole between the cross-border platform and the logistics agency to make malicious claims, and received a total of more than 130,000 yuan in compensation.
In the end, the Jiangbei District Procuratorate of Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province filed a public prosecution, and the court agreedFraudDefendant Shao X was sentencedTwo years' imprisonment, suspended for three years, and a fine of 10,000 yuan
Let's take a look at how this Shao took advantage of loopholes to make money.
Shao is not on the Amazon platform, but on a certain speed platform, and the shipments sold by Shao on this platform are all shipped through a certain Yan company. This is similar to the FBM self-shipping model on Amazon.
So what if the shipment is lost? This Yan company will compensate the seller.
By chance, Shao found that he had submitted an application for compensation for a package that had not been lost, and strangely, he had also received compensation.
This opened Shao's inner Pandora's box, and a ** idea was born.
It turned out that this was because there was a problem with the receiving process of a certain Yan company.
When the pickup driver of a Yan company picks up work, he will put all the small packages received in a large box, and in the end, the driver will only scan the barcode on the large box, and the tracking number system of the small packages in the large package will be picked up by default.
After the driver of a Yan company sends the large package to the sorting center, the staff will open the large package and scan the barcode of the small package one by one, and those small packages that do not exist will naturally not be put into storage.
After 7 days, the online tracking information of these small parcels will be closed, and it will show "Pickup by the logistics company has not been delivered".
Subsequently, Shao can initiate a compensation application on a speed platform according to the logistics order number in his hand, and the reason for the claim is that the logistics company lost it after collection, no warehousing, and no online record (that is, the common unextracted).
After receiving the claim application, the platform will wait for the company to submit evidence within 3 days.
But this batch of small parcels does not exist in the first place, ** evidence of coming?
Therefore, the Yan company naturally cannot prove that the small package has been put into storage, so the cross-border platform believes that this is the responsibility of the Yan company (because you have a barcode but can't find the goods).
At this time, Shao's claim was successful, and the compensation of a certain Yan company would be paid to Shao's platform account.
Therefore, after this Shao tasted the sweetness for the first time, he began to launch claims again and again, and finally obtained a total of stolen money for claims130,000 yuan
However, if no one knows, unless they do it, in the end, the employees of this courier company found a large number of abnormal claims pointing to the same seller, so they chose to call the police.
Shao is also happy, the public security organs didn't make a lot of effort, just gave Shao a **, and he took the initiative to go to the public security bureau to confess all of them, and he was given a lenient sentence.
Finally, the Ningbo Jiangbei District People's Court toFraud, sentenced defendant Shao X to two years imprisonment, suspended for three years, and fined 10,000 yuan.
The sentence is two and three, at least you don't have to go in and squat.
Some sellers also asked: Why did he earn 130,000 yuan of illegal gains, but only fined him 10,000 yuan, isn't he still making 120,000 yuan?
These sellers may have confused two concepts, one is illegal gains (stolen money) and the other is fines.
The 130,000 illegal gains were to be collected and returned to the victim in accordance with the process, and the 10,000 yuan fine was paid by Shao himself.
There is no doubt that the law will not allow anyone to benefit from illegal acts.
This incident also sounded the alarm for those who like to pick wool, some legal wool can be picked casually, some illegal wool, don't touch it!
End of full text!