Don't let us join NATO? Then you can only engage in nuclear **! The United States and Europe have a headache
Ukraine will not allow to join NATO? Then you can only engage in nuclear **! How can this not make people angry? Look at the current Ukraine, how difficult the situation is, there is not even a victory on the battlefield, but a big defeat. This defeat was not ordinary, and the blow to Ukrainian morale was unprecedented. Ukraine is now no longer capable of turning the tide and has begun to go to extremes. They actually target Russian civilian facilities and civilians, which is completely beyond the bottom line of the war, too extreme! The whole country of Ukraine is now paralyzed, millions of people have become refugees, young people have died in battle**, and the future of Ukraine is overdrawn.
Ukraine now wants to engage in nuclear **, this is being forced to Liangshan! They used to be a nuclear power, then they gave up nuclear **, and now they regret it. However, it is not so easy for Ukraine to engage in nuclear ** again. What are they going to do to develop and manufacture nuclear **? Technically, they may be able to do it, but the reality is not that simple. Ukrainian parliamentarians even publicly warned NATO that if they were not allowed to join NATO, they would only be able to engage in nuclear **. This is a provocation against NATO, and a provocation against Russia. What are they doing here? Jokes?
The United States and Europe have a headache, they don't want Ukraine to engage in nuclear **. This is a very dangerous thing, once Ukraine makes a nuclear **, Europe will face the risk of nuclear war. The United States and Europe do not want to see this happen, and they will definitely take measures to stop Ukraine. Although Ukraine has the technical basis for engaging in nuclear weapons, in the current situation, it is not so easy to engage in nuclear weapons. Their infrastructure has been destroyed, and if they want to build a nuclear ** again, they have to rebuild it, which is not a task that can be completed overnight.
All in all, the idea of Ukraine engaging in nuclear ** is unrealistic. They want to use this to change the situation, but doing so will only make things worse. There is no doubt that the United States and Europe will never allow Ukraine to engage in nuclear **. If Ukraine wants to get out of its predicament, it can only solve the problem peacefully, and not threaten others by engaging in nuclear **. Hopefully, Ukraine will calm down and not make the wrong choice, which is also harmful to themselves.
Summary: The idea of Ukraine engaging in nuclear ** is unrealistic, it will only make things worse. Hopefully, Ukraine will calm down and not make the wrong choice.
This article was created according to your requirements and Zhang Zhaozhong's writing style, if you need to adjust or have other requirements, please feel free to let me know.
The secret of the crisis in the United States is revealed: China KO in seven days, the world is shocked!
In this changing world, the United States, once a great power, is so powerless in the face of China's rising military peak. Imagine that if a high-intensity conflict really breaks out between China and the United States, there is a possibility that the United States will "admit intimidation" in just seven days, which makes people feel very emotional.
Speaking of China's military history, it can be described as twists and turns. Since the beginning of the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, we have been a new country that lacks even large-scale modernization, and was regarded as a "raw material country" by the Soviet Union at that time. However, the victory of the Chinese People's Liberation Army in the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea impressed the Soviet Union, so we began to imitate the Soviet Union **, filling the gap in military equipment. This history reminds me of the perseverance and hard work of that era, which was the first step for China to become strong.
But that is not the end, after the rupture of Sino-Soviet relations, we understood the importance of advanced **, so we looked at the whole world and aimed at the development of nuclear **. In 1964 and 1967, China successively succeeded in the first atomic bomb and hydrogen bomb, but more importantly, we realized that it was not enough to simply possess nuclear weapons, and we must have the means of projection. So, in 1968, the H-6 flew into the sky for the first time; In 1970, Hongguo's first nuclear submarine, 091, was launched. The decision-making of this period was the beginning of China's emergence on the world military stage.
However, in the 80s and 90s, we at one time slowed down the pace of military development, focusing on the economy, and most of the military equipment was imported from abroad. However, this was only a temporary stagnation, and after decades of tempering, we returned to the path of military research and development. Now, looking back on the past, we no longer just look up to the bombers and aircraft carriers of other countries, we have our own three aircraft carriers, a complete and neat bomber formation, and highly efficient anti-jamming communications equipment. All this is a footnote to China's strength.
At the same time, the military power of the United States seems to be in trouble. The United States has always regarded itself as a powerful military force, hoarding a large amount of nuclear and conventional armaments, and using firepower to maintain its so-called "hegemonic status". However, over time, their military resources have rapidly dwindled in recent years, especially in the Israeli-Palestinian and Russian-Ukrainian wars, where they consumed staggering amounts of ammunition to support their allies. For example, the AGM-158 series of over-the-horizon missiles, commonly used by the US Air Force, may be sharply reduced in the near future. According to think tank data, it is estimated that by 2025, there may be only 6,500 missiles left in the AGM-158 family. This is a huge challenge for a country that emphasizes military superiority.
In this regard, in stark contrast to China, we advocate peaceful development, and long-term peace has enabled our country to improve its strength and at the same time have a large number of stockpiles of ammunition. This has enabled us not only to make significant military progress, but also to have abundant military resources. This state of "coexistence of quality and quantity" makes China more competitive in the world.
Of course, the United States' predicament is not only reflected in the reduction of military resources, but also in its internal problems. Corruption is rampant within the military, and it frequently asks the Congress for money on various grounds. For example, in the process of rebuilding Afghanistan, the US military has spent a lot of money without significantly improving the lives of the Afghan people. This kind of behavior of purchasing luxury goods with huge sums of money has made the image of the US military in the international community confusing.
With the development of the Internet age, the transparency of information has made unfavorable news about the strength of the United States spread all over the world. Whether it is its support operations in the Israeli-Palestinian war or its performance in the war in Ukraine, the image of the United States has been questioned. As a result, not only is the outside world not optimistic about the United States, but even the people of the United States themselves have begun to become disillusioned with their own country. They pay taxes to support their country, but the people are chilled when they see the luxuries that their country's soldiers have exchanged for money.
Since Biden took office, he has not achieved significant results in terms of epidemic management or national unity, which has further weakened Americans' trust in **. In addition, a series of behaviors of the United States in international affairs, such as support for Israel, make anyone with some morality unbearable. The most serious thing is that a series of operations in the United States have led to problems in the US economy, and the national debt has continued, which has caused the American people to fall into a panic about the economic collapse and jumping off the building.
If we turn our attention to the international community, the United States will be even less advantageous. With the development of the "Belt and Road" platform, China has established good exchanges with more than 100 countries, and the world's multipolar pattern is gradually taking shape. In addition to basic agricultural and industrial products, we have also carried out military, scientific and technological cooperation with more and more countries, in order to lead human development more widely and deeply. The United States, on the other hand, seems to be more focused on its own development, and it seems that the future of all mankind is not in their consideration.
The world is bustling, all for profit. The reputation of the United States is getting worse and worse in such an environment, and when people have the opportunity to choose peaceful development and mutually beneficial progress towards a better future, the main culprits who bring war and disaster to the world will be hated. In international affairs, with the exception of the European Union, which has the best interests with the United States because of its financial relations, the United States is becoming less and less "popular."
All in all, the conclusion given by the US think tank that "if a high-intensity conflict breaks out with China, the US resources can only last for about seven days" is an exaggeration, but it is by no means a blind exaggeration. No one can say for sure what the future will bring, but if the United States wants to regain its former glory, it must adapt to the development and changes of the times and abandon its outdated and selfish ideas, otherwise it will only be abandoned by the times. Today, the world is undergoing earth-shaking changes, and whoever can keep up with the trend and adapt to the trend will be the winner of the future.
As a result, a series of operations by the United States have not only not brought benefits, but have led to the accumulation of economic problems. The national debt continues to collapse, which makes the American people fall into a panic that will collapse at any time and "jump off the building" at any time. Under such internal and external troubles, the international status of the United States is becoming more and more unoptimistic.
At the same time, the evolution of the international situation also poses a challenge to the United States. China's "One Belt, One Road" platform continues to develop, and has established good exchanges with more than 100 countries or regions, and the world's multipolar pattern is gradually taking shape. China actively participates in global affairs, cooperates with more and more countries, and promotes exchanges and cooperation in science and technology, military and other fields, with a view to leading human development in a broader and deeper way.
In this era of bustling and profitable world, America's reputation is declining. People are increasingly seeing a series of problems in the United States, from military strength to economic policy to international behavior, which make people doubt it. Outside of financial relations, the United States is becoming less and less "popular."
All in all, the statements of the US think tanks may be exaggerated, but they are not unfounded. It is difficult to predict the future trend, but if the United States wants to get out of its current predicament, it must adapt to the development and changes of the times. Old and selfish ideas will only make them sink deeper and deeper, and they may eventually be abandoned by the times. On this world stage, China's rise and America's ability to rise to the challenge depends entirely on their future choices and actions.