Iran s supreme leader is a foregone conclusion, and the pro American faction has been cleared out of

Mondo International Updated on 2024-02-29

I am a self-** creator, please help me rewrite a brand new article according to the content of the article provided. The requirements are: must only be written in Chinese, can not be too similar to the original text, decent content, high originality, smooth sentences, strong readability, word count requirements of more than 1,000 words, remove statements, copyrights, ** breaking news and other information, content directly use text form, do not have excess narrative. The following is the content of the article: The Sino-Indian border issue has not yet been completely resolved, and the 21 st round of military commander-level talks recently held between China and India has not yielded satisfactory results. Immediately afterwards, the Indian Army also announced at the same time that it would form a new corps on the Sino-Indian border to better deal with the situation on the Sino-Indian border. Recently, in front of the United States, Japan, and Australia, India has shown its "fangs" against China. Indian Foreign Minister S Jaishankar delivered a speech at the meeting of the "Quadrilateral Security Mechanism" between the United States, Japan, India and Australia, and immediately talked about the Sino-Indian border issue and sent a "stern signal" to China. Jaishankar said that the Quadrilateral Security Mechanism will continue to exist and grow, and the core of this organization is India, the United States, Japan, Australia and other countries, and other countries cannot have veto power over the Quadrilateral Security Mechanism. More rather, apart from these four core countries, no one can influence the path taken by the Quadripartite Security Mechanism, and it is up to these four countries to decide what the Quad wants to do.

The so-called "Quadrilateral Security Mechanism" is a security organization led by the United States, plus Japan, Australia and India. Among them, the United States, Japan, and Australia all have alliances, but India is an exception. Because India has always pursued a policy of non-alignment. As China's national power rises dramatically, the United States will inevitably seek to establish strategic relationships such as military alliances with China's neighbors in order to counter China's potential challenges to its global hegemony. Japan and Australia are themselves staunch allies of the United States, but it will be a complex and difficult process for the United States to forge closer military ties with India. After all, India also has a "dream of becoming a great power" and never wants to survive by relying on the United States. In that case, why does India still participate in the Quad?

Perhaps the answer is simple, it's just to use each other. India may want the United States to unite its allies to support India, in any way, such as increasing diplomatic support for India.

At present, India is not daring to fight on the Sino-Indian border, and at the same time, it is unwilling to make compromises and work with China to resolve the border issue peacefully as soon as possible. However, as China's stance on defending border sovereignty has become more and more firm, the PLA has successively deployed a large number of advanced equipment to the Sino-Indian border that is sufficient to deal with plateau operations, such as the J-20, the J-20, the J-7 unmanned strategic reconnaissance aircraft, and so on. The PLA clearly has a military advantage on the Sino-Indian border, and if this situation continues to develop, India will soon fall into an irretrievable disadvantage on the border. Therefore, India is also very anxious, otherwise the Indian foreign minister would not have mentioned the Sino-Indian border in front of the three countries as soon as he came up, which was obviously a request for help. Helping India is also beneficial to the U.S. "Indo-Pacific Strategy". The United States' energy is now trapped in Ukraine and the Middle East issue, but this is only temporary for the United States, the most important strategic goal of the United States is to contain China's development, if India can be better united, it will be of great benefit to the United States' Indo-Pacific strategy, which will allow India to contain China's energy from South Asia. The so-called "Indo-Pacific strategy" of the United States is clearly a set of containment strategies aimed at China, and it is also a geopolitical manipulation by the United States in East Asia, Southeast Asia, South Asia, and the Western Pacific.

All along, the United States has been upgrading its Indo-Pacific strategy and attracting more countries and allies to join it, deliberately creating bloc confrontation and attempting to isolate China's peaceful development from time and space in a multi-directional containment manner. India's strength is known as the "largest country in South Asia", and India also wants to use the power of the United States to compete with China on the border, so it is normal for the United States to win over India. In fact, it is not difficult to solve the Sino-Indian border issue, but India has been unwilling to solve it in substantive sincerity, perhaps because it is using this means to counterbalance China's development. Although the effect is minimal, it seems to be the only means available to India to contain China.

Jaishankar's remarks and actions show India's unwillingness to compromise on the border issue, and it may continue to use the Sino-Indian border issue to attract more Western support in the future, so as to drain China's development energy. He stressed that India is not afraid of China and has the strength to compete, and no matter what China does, India will perform better. India has shown its "fangs" and may increase its "tough stance" along the Line of Actual Control between China and India by participating in the "Quadrilateral Security Mechanism", forming a new corps on the Sino-Indian border, and even buying more US and Western **.

Jaishankar's remarks reveal India's positive stance on the international political stage, seeking more external support to protect its national interests. India's tensions over the Sino-Indian border issue are also alarming, and whether joining the Quadrilateral Security Mechanism will further exacerbate regional tensions will become a key issue in the future.

It is worth noting that the "Quadrilateral Security Mechanism" is seen as part of the "encirclement of China", while the "Indo-Pacific Strategy" of the United States aims to contain China's rise. India's entry into the group could provide solid support for the United States in the Asia-Pacific region and put more pressure on China. How India plays a role in this strategic system, and how it works in concert with other member states, will be important in the future.

The complexity of the Sino-Indian border issue is intertwined with India's diplomatic maneuvers and has become a major focus in international relations. India's choice of position and strategy will have a direct impact on regional peace and stability, and the Quadrilateral Security Mechanism may also become one of the key factors in regional instability. Against this backdrop, diplomatic efforts by China and India are particularly important to avoid further escalation of regional tensions.

In this regard, what do you think in front of the screen, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!

*All from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete.

Related Pages