Britain stirs up trouble in the world, making the world unpeaceful, and he has a stick that he forks over, but if he does too many bad things, he will be punished after all.
According to the Global Times on February 5, Michelle O'Neill, vice chairman of the nationalist party Sinn Féin in Northern Ireland, was elected chief minister of Northern Ireland two days ago. She said in public interviews that Northern Ireland had embarked on a "decade of opportunity" and that she expected a referendum on reunification with the Republic of Ireland within the next decade.
Judging from the current signs of development in the UK, it seems that it is increasingly proving that Cameron's choice of the Brexit referendum was an extremely irresponsible approach.
There is no doubt that if Scotland, Northern Ireland and other regions finally break away from British rule as a result, then Cameron will inevitably bear the blame.
In other words, even if Brexit can bring some short-term benefits to the UK, how can it compare with the damage caused by the fragmentation of the country?
What I have always stressed is that whether or not to leave the EU should be a major historical event that needs to be carefully considered. Whether Brexit or Remain, the impact on the UK is likely to last for decades, if not centuries.
Cameron's decision to hand over such a historic choice to ordinary people to vote for, and even wanted to use it as a tool for party struggle, and then resigned at the speed of light after the referendum failed, is completely a manifestation of his lack of political responsibility, and the manifestation of his lack of leadership responsibility and unwillingness to assume political responsibility as the leader of the United Kingdom.
I have never denied that Brexit is certainly in the interests of a significant proportion of the British people. But no one can deny that Brexit will also hurt the interests of others – such as Scots and Northern Irish. This is one of the important reasons why they chose to leave the UK today.
Therefore, on the issue of Brexit, it is extremely stupid to decide by means of a referendum.
On the one hand, this is "many for the minority". Is it just because there are a few fewer people whose interests are harmed than those who receive them that their interests are rightfully ignored?
On the other hand, the vast majority of Britons who voted could only see the short-term benefits in their own hands, but could not see the long-term damage of Britain as the possibility of falling apart. Asking these people to make a decision that could affect them for hundreds of years is obviously a way for politicians like Cameron to avoid the consequences of making bad decisions and "shift" the responsibility for making decisions to ordinary Britons.
Finally, from an objective point of view, for Britain at that time, was there really only two extremely opposing choices: "Brexit" and "Remain"?
Will there be a third, fourth, or even more option?
For example, the UK can choose to reluctantly remain in the EU, but must let ** fight for the greater interests of its own country in the EU in the future?
For example, the United Kingdom can also choose to leave the European Union, but it is more planned and more global. That is, to take care of both vested interests and those whose interests have been severely damaged by Brexit. And the whole process needs to minimize the negative impact of Brexit.
So you can see that before and after Brexit, the UK has gone from the folk to the strange phenomenon of throwing the pot at each other.
What Cameron thinks is: I don't make decisions myself anyway, you Britons make your own decisions, and you take responsibility for what happens.
The British were divided into two factions, those who wanted to leave the European Union and those who did not. The end result was a slightly larger number of people in favor of Brexit.
Cameron saw that the basket was bigger after Brexit, and he slapped his ass and left, throwing a mess to Aunt May and the successor behind him.
After Brexit, the UK's development did not go well, and its GDP was even surpassed by India, the younger brother of the year. What's even more tragic is that Scotland and today Northern Ireland both want to be independent.
At this time, many Britons regretted Brexit, and those who opposed Brexit came out to scold the streets, but what was the use? Even if it is referendum and re-added, this back and forth, the problems within the UK have long been infinitely magnified.
February** Dynamic Incentive Program