As a well-known "-stirring stick" in international geopolitics, Britain is the initiator of many regional contradictions in Asia, Africa and Latin America, and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is no exception. But now, their new foreign secretary, David Cameron, has announced an important decision that has some meaning of drawing a line with Israel.
Cameron, the new foreign secretary and former prime minister of the United Kingdom.
The current round of Palestinian-Israeli conflict has been fought until now, and I believe many viewers know that the establishment of Israel originated from the United Nations Resolution 181 in 1947. But in reality, the process of preparing for the founding of the Jews predates this time, and at the end of the 19th century, a group of Zionists gathered to try to find a place for the Jews to live.
In 1917, the group's vice-president was the famous Rothschild, and in 1917 he wrote a letter to AJ Balfour, then British Foreign Secretary, about the return of the Jews to Palestine, known as the Balfour DeclarationThis was later considered by later generations to be the first official declaration of the world's leading countries in support of Jewish statehood in Palestine.
The Balfour Declaration of 1917 became the umbrella under which the Jews developed in Palestine.
At that time, Britain was the de facto administrator of Palestine, and we all know that the British are best at using religion and ** to provoke regional disputes, and then profit from it as a mediator. On the Palestinian issue, they have successively made promises to Arabs and Jews to establish a state, which can be understood as "one house for two sales", which has laid the foundation for the deep blood feud between Jews and Palestinians over the past 100 years.
Time has passed, and Britain is no longer the world's first empire, but they surprisingly retain their true colors as "-stirring sticks". At the beginning of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak personally went to Israel to stand up for Netanyahu, and the United States and the Houthis exchanged fire head-on, and Britain followed suit and launched a joint air strike on Yemen.
US-UK joint air strikes on Yemen: Delay me to make money, then fight.
The latest news on the situation in the Red Sea is that the British side announced that they will send the "Elizabeth" aircraft carrier battle group to replace the squad of the US "Eisenhower." But the question is, before they also said that they would send an aircraft carrier, because the supply ship did not recruit enough crew and could not leave the port, what happened now, there are enough people, and the aircraft carrier is not afraid of the main shaft breaking, can it go to sea smoothly?
We can understand the "father-son relationship" between Britain and the United States, and the White House will bite whoever the White House asks it to bite. So what if the White House orders to take a bite out of Israel? A few days ago, British Foreign Secretary David Cameron said that Britain is ready to recognize the state of Palestine in advance, saying that in the past 30 years, Israel has suffered a complete failure in various strategies against the Palestinians, and until now, it is already one of the most developed countries in the world, and behind it is still the two great powers of Britain and the United States, Israel, which cannot even provide a safe environment for citizens.
Earlier, Sunak visited Israel to highlight the UK's support for Israel.
At the beginning of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, Colombian **Petro posted on social media** that the only way for Israeli children to sleep peacefully is for Palestinian children to sleep peacefully. At that time, not many people paid attention to him, because everyone thought that the end of the Israeli heavenly army and the elimination of Hamas was a matter of minutes, and there was no need to worry about it at all. But Gaza has been fighting for more than 3 months, and the Israeli army has not only failed to eliminate Hamas, but even its own economy has been dragged down, coupled with the impact of the United States at home, Biden has long wanted to be dragged in the Middle East.
The United States has told Israel that you had better accept the two-state solution, or else I will do whatever I want. Rejected by Netanyahu categorically, and now that Britain has caught up with the United States, how should Israel respond? Cameron said that Britain has a responsibility to implement the UN's "two-state solution", the Palestinians must see "irreversible progress", and we don't even have to wait for the Palestinians and Israelis to reach a new peace agreement, and before the two countries can negotiate, we can recognize the Palestinian state.
Netanyahu is gone.
I thought that when you Cameron first took office, the newcomer would have a new atmosphere, but I didn't expect your first important decision to be a backstab Israel. Of course, this is also Israel's own fault, if they had behaved better on the battlefield in Gaza and did not go against the rest of the world, Britain and the United States would not have withdrawn their stools so quickly. To say that the British are still smart, seeing the general trend, they can't resist it, and immediately turn the gun and occupy the moral high ground first, perhaps this is the "cultural heritage" left by Britain as a world hegemon for more than 200 years.
List of high-quality authors