What is the impact of shortening primary school by 1 year and adding 1 year of junior high school to students' learning?
Mo Yan, winner of our Nobel Prize for Literature, and Yao Yang, a professor at Peking University, appealed to the education authorities, saying that the current school system is too long and that they hope that the education authorities will abolish the entrance examination and shorten the school system in order to reduce the study pressure on students.
China's education system has been implemented is 6 + 3 + 3 school system, that is, primary school 6 years, junior high school 3 years, high school 3 years of education system, this school system model has been implemented for many years, students have adapted to this school model, recently, recently, there is news that the education department will shorten the one-year primary school system, extend the one-year middle school system, so that middle school students have more time to study and review, in order to improve student performance and admission rate.
If primary education were shortened by one year and secondary education was extended by one year, would this have an impact on student learning?
If the Ministry of Education does decide to shorten the duration of primary education by one year and extend the duration of secondary education by one year, it means that the 633 education system will be adjusted to the 543 education system, which may be good news for secondary school students.
In the eyes of most parents, the learning task of primary school is relatively easy and simple, even if the school system of primary school students is shortened by one year and five years, all the knowledge of primary school can be learned, and the accumulation of basic knowledge of primary school students will not have much impact, but if one year of secondary school education is added, it means that middle school students have one more year of review and study time, which can relieve the pressure and learning anxiety of primary school students. This can alleviate the pressure and study anxiety of students.
At the end of the nine years of compulsory education, students take the first major exam in their lives. Only students with excellent results in the entrance examination can stand out, and if their grades are not satisfactory, they will also be ruthlessly eliminated. After the implementation of the baccalaureate stream, the ratio of general education to vocational education has been reduced from 3:7 to 5:5, which means that about half of the students will face the embarrassing situation of being diverted. This is the last thing parents want to see.
If the Ministry of Education succeeds in effectively increasing the number of years of secondary education by one year, it can also reduce the burden and pressure on students caused by the baccalaureate policy, which may be more conducive to students' learning and development than the 633 school system.
if the ministry of education really decides to implement the 5+4+3 academic structure, it will take the initiative in some regions for a certain period of time and only consider implementing it nationwide after the results are f**ourable.beijing, being the pilot region for education in china, whenever the ministry of education promulgates a new policy, it will take the initiative to implement it in the beijing region first and only after the results are f**ourable will it consider implementing it nationwide.
The Ministry of Education plans to implement the reform of the school system in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and other regions for a period of time, but it is clear that the reform will not be carried out in a hurry, otherwise students with poor adaptability will not be able to adapt to the new school system in a short time, which will affect students' learning.
In the process of students' growth, parents should not be too anxious, not only to participate in school education, but also to participate in family education and social education, I hope that parents will not add too much learning burden and pressure to students, they should calm down, step by step, take their time, too deep learning is not suitable for students to learn, but it will be counterproductive, so that students have a deeper understanding of what they have learned, which will be counterproductive and will make them bored with learning.
What do you think of the proposed"5+4+3 "Academic? Parents in front of the screen, do you support the changes in the new school system?