The Palestinian-Israeli conflict has been going on for weeks, causing hundreds of deaths and **, triggering widespread concern and condemnation from the international community. The United States has been seen as a staunch ally of Israel in this conflict, giving Israel political, military, and diplomatic support. However, as the conflict escalated and the humanitarian crisis intensified, the U.S. position also saw some changes, from initial full support, to gradually increasing warnings and criticism of Israel, to calling for a "temporary ceasefire" on both sides.
There are many reasons why the United States has changed its degree. First, the United States is under domestic and international pressure to play a more active role in the Palestinian-Israeli issue, rather than standing idly by or aiding in the abuse. In the United States, many people, politicians and politicians have expressed their dissatisfaction with Israel's violent acts, and demanded that the United States stop providing funds to Israel and support the adoption of a ceasefire resolution by the United Nations Security Council. The United States International, many countries and regions, especially Middle Eastern countries, have also expressed strong dissatisfaction and opposition to the favoritism and connivance of the United States, holding that the United States is the main culprit in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and should bear responsibility for it.
Second, the United States is also aware that continuing to support Israel will not only fail to resolve the root cause of the Palestinian-Israeli issue, but will aggravate turbulence and instability in the Middle East and damage the interests and image of the United States. The United States is now in a difficult period, dealing not only with the epidemic at home, economic and social issues, but also with international competition and challenges, especially from China's rise and influence. If the Palestinian-Israeli conflict continues, the United States will not only lose its allies and partners in the Middle East, but will also encounter more hostility and resistance, and may even trigger a larger-scale war and terrorism. At the same time, the United States will lose its morality and credibility in the international community and be seen as an irresponsible and untrustworthy country.
Therefore, the change in the attitude of the United States in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is actually a manifestation of helplessness and powerlessness, and an attempt at self-protection and self-redemption. However, this change in the United States has not brought about substantial improvement or alleviation of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, but has further reduced the influence of the United States in the Middle East and further increased China's influence in the Middle East. China has always adhered to the principles of fairness and equality, supported the just aspirations of the Palestinian people, and called on both sides to stop violence, resume dialogue and achieve peace. China has not only actively promoted the adoption of the ceasefire resolution at the UN Security Council, but also played an important mediating role in the Middle East, facilitating reconciliation between Saudi Arabia and Iran and other countries, and contributing to peace and stability in the Middle East.
Recently, the leaders of Saudi Arabia and Iran held a historic meeting under the auspices of China, expressing their willingness to improve relations and cooperation, which is also a kind of indifference and rejection of Israel, and a kind of challenge and warning to the United States. The rapprochement between Saudi Arabia and Iran means a major change in the balance of power in the Middle East, and the isolation and marginalization of the United States and Israel will intensify. The change in the attitude of the United States in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict will not only fail to reverse its loss of power in the Middle East, but will accelerate its decline in the Middle East. China's attitude and role in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict not only reflect its rise in the Middle East, but also demonstrate its responsibilities in the Middle East.