In the past two days, a voice has appeared on the Internet. The reason is that Hu Xijin said that Bill Gates and Musk blessed the Chinese New Year, and Lao Hu asked: Will our entrepreneurs be scolded miserably if they bless Christmas?
In this way, we suggest that our ** field may be more open and viewable.
Under Lao Hu's **, many people are talking about Lao Hu. After this incident, such a voice appeared. Some bloggers quoted Lao Hu and Professor Chu Yin's remarks to say that those who scolded Lao Hu were yesExtreme populism, saying that they are blindly xenophobic, and they also regard their behavior as patriotic, and even say whether this behavior is patriotic or harmful to the country. They also give examples: For example, in some places or in some aspects of China, if something foreign appears, or someone praises something foreign, especially something that once invaded China, it will be indiscriminately denounced as a cultural invasion and ideological invasion, and whoever dares to oppose it is a foreigner, even a spy, and a thief. They are trying to use this nonsense to conclude the name of this part of extreme populism. In the name of reason, the truth of ** and slander. For such articles, their remarks really cannot withstand scrutiny, and only a casual reading will be blinded by their superficial meaning, and they will agree with their views, feel that they are right, and think that those patriotic people are actually harming the country and hindering the development of the country, so that they will feel disgusted with their so-called "extreme populism" in their hearts. One of the interesting things I found for these bloggers is that the title and content of their articles are almost the same, and the text and punctuation are all the same. This has to make people think deeply, read their articles carefully, and then go up to analysis, we will find that this kind of article is just under the guise of persuading people to be rational, and actually carry out the act of ** and slandering patriots. It seems to make sense, but it's nonsense. Avoiding the important and making things up, with the intention of confusing right and wrong.
They said: In some places or in some aspects of China, if something foreign appears, or someone praises something foreign, especially something that once invaded China, it will be indiscriminately denounced as a cultural invasion and an ideological invasion, and whoever dares to oppose it will be a foreigner, even a spy, and a thief.
They also said: On the other hand, some Western countries in the United States are open to cultural exchanges and cultural dissemination. There are many Chinese elements in their society that can make populists proud, but they can't make populists open-minded. They blindly talk about cultural exchanges, but in fact ignore the current society, many places are full of Western culture and lifestyle, isn't this a normal cultural exchange? Didn't they see it?
For normal cultural exchanges, we all face them with an inclusive and open attitude, and many of us oppose the remarks of Lao Hu and others because we are more rational.
With a series of operations by Western countries, we have seen their true colors more clearly, not that we are clamoring for the West to carry out cultural invasion, but that the West is already carrying out cultural invasion.
They say: Chinese flavor is floating in the United States, American flavor cannot be found in China, and extreme populism is not advisable.
With the development of the times, the exchange, integration and collision of international cultures are inevitable, and they only see that Chinese culture is more and more valued in the West on the Internet, but selectively ignore the spread and popularity of Western culture in China.
They keep their mouths shut about the fact that the United States believes that TikTok is a cultural invasion carried out by China, threatening the United States and then suppressing it, they selectively ignore the sale of German cars in China, but Chinese cars are rejected by the European market, they forget that the West, which claims to be a free world, cannot tolerate a small Huawei, while Apple has nothing to hinder in our country.
The antipathy that many people have towards Western countries today is not populism, but the evil fruit of the West itself.
List of high-quality authors