After-school delay is actually a school welfare, cutting parents leeks!
Extracurricular activities are good for schools, but they are harmful to parents.
The current extra-curricular activities are too long and have brought unrest to society, and while many are calling for the abolition of extracurricular activities, it seems far away. A teacher revealed the underlying cause of this phenomenon on the Internet.
The teacher said: In my teaching career, I have encountered a problem. Some school administrators get more money from part-time teachers each month than they are paid, and even for the average teacher, it is a considerable extra money. In fact, off-campus delayed services may appear to be a perk on the surface, but in reality they are cutting meat from the parents of students.
This assertion essentially illustrates the nature of the delayed service, which is that it has become a new way to make money. Another teacher said on the Internet: Extracurricular tutoring is actually an excuse for parents.
On the one hand, there is both the need to reduce the burden on society and the need to increase the amount of time students spend in school, and these two contradictions seem to be opposites, but in fact they are mutually reinforcing. Even more puzzling is the fact that despite the slogan of reducing the burden, students are spending more and more time in school. What happens if free extracurricular activities are introduced? Chances are, they won't give you this service for all sorts of reasons, after all, it's asking for money. Due to the high cost, schools are able to participate in such activities in an almost entirely voluntary manner.
The words of these two teachers explain why the extended service cannot be canceled.
First of all, the delay is approved by the Ministry of Education, and it is legal, so it is difficult for parents to object, if not against it. Delayed services are also being implemented in rural areas, which is approved by the Ministry of Education, and the fees are reasonable, which is why it is so fast.
Because the school's own funds are limited, the school will not easily cancel the tuition fees without a valid reason. As a result, many schools will find ways to involve students, and some even replace the original curriculum for a longer period of time. If you do not participate in after-school services, you can return home on your own, which is also one of the headaches for parents.
At present, the enthusiasm of colleges and universities to delay teaching is very high, which is largely determined by the economic benefits. If it's free, it's going to cost a lot of money. While the amount of money per student is paying for the delay may not seem high, it is quite significant when all the students are gathered.
Please note that not all costs for delayed services are borne by the school. After receiving the money, the school will hand over the money to the local finance department and return it at the end of the semester. When returned, the local education department will keep some of it and return the rest to the school. In the school, it's not just the long-serving teachers, but also the school leadership, administration, and support departments. Some principals even earn more than front-line teachers, but because they have decision-making power, teachers are helpless about it.
Of course, the university does not want to abolish the system, after all, they have also suffered from late fees. Not only does this save you the hassle of running back and forth between classes, but it also has a considerable income. So they have a positive attitude towards longer classes because it is profitable.
There is a great conflict between the policy of increasing classes and reducing fees in China, and it is difficult to get a reasonable explanation.
The state stipulates that primary school students should not spend more than six hours a day in school, but we have implemented extended classes that allow students to stay in school for an additional two hours; The state stipulates that primary school students' homework should not be more than one hour, but we have implemented after-school tutoring, which has become two hours, which has caused the increase in the amount of homework; The state advocates voluntary participation and expands working hours, and we almost all participate in the joint implementation; The state proposes that local** should cover a portion of the deferred tuition, while we let parents pay the full amount of tuition.
As a result, our extended service has largely deviated from its original goal and has essentially become a way to collect fees from students' parents and make profits for the school.
At the end of the article, the author wrote: I think that in the future, as long as the local ** is willing to pay, the parents will not be so resistant. In the final analysis, the core of this matter is the problem of money, parents refuse to pay, and the school refuses to give. However, few scholars think from the perspective of their students. Our children spend more than ten hours a day in school, are they really happy? Is it really because of those children?
At the end of the article, the researchers call for future education policies to put students' physical and mental health ahead of all considerations.
What do those who have this kind of problem think? Share it!
The author of this article has no intentions, nor does it have any intentions regarding any country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The information provided in this ** does not mean that it agrees or agrees with any laws, rules, opinions, actions, or is responsible for the correctness of the information contained therein. The author of the article is not responsible for the above or related issues, and does not assume any legal responsibility.