In the past two years, the state has strongly supported new energy vehicles, and consumers have gradually recognized that they are in the limelight. This is not an apocryphal, but a reality.
In a community in Jining, Shandong Province, the property issued a notice prohibiting new energy vehicles from entering the community, which clearly stated: "In order to strengthen the fire safety management of the community, new energy vehicles are prohibited from entering the community from now on." "The time is January 17, 2024. As soon as the notice was issued, it immediately aroused the dissatisfaction and anger of many new energy vehicle owners.
Many owners are puzzled and even angry at such regulations, believing that this is a discriminatory practice against new energy vehicles and a choking on food. The safety of new energy vehicles is higher than that of electric vehicles, electric four-wheeled vehicles, and old men, but there is no obstacle to the property. After the incident was on the Internet, it also caused a heated discussion among netizens, is this approach appropriate?
Through various understandings, the property said that the main consideration for issuing such a notice is fire safety. They are worried that new energy vehicles may have potential safety hazards such as spontaneous combustion, and in the event of an emergency such as fire, it will bring great threats to the fire safety of the community. In addition, as the Spring Festival is approaching, it is inevitable that some people will set off fireworks, and the fire safety of the community will face a greater test.
Is this concern about property reasonable, and is it really necessary to impose a "one-size-fits-all" ban on new energy vehicles? On this topic, the expert's opinion is: although there are indeed many cases of spontaneous combustion of new energy vehicles, most of them are in the process of charging and discharging, or in accidents such as collisions, and the cases are also occasional and not universal. The available evidence shows that the safety of new energy vehicles is no worse than that of traditional fuel vehicles. The property in the community simply prohibits new energy vehicles from entering the community, which is improper, unscientific and unreasonable.
In addition, some new energy vehicle owners who have bought parking spaces are also prohibited from entering the community by the property, which is obviously a violation of the owner's right of residence and right of use. The property regulations of the community clearly override the ownership. Moreover, there is no prohibition on new energy vehicles entering the community in the property law.
So, the question is, how should the community property balance the relationship between fire safety and residents' travel needs?
Actually, this is not an unsolvable problem. First of all, the property can ensure the fire safety of the community by strengthening the maintenance and inspection of fire protection facilities; Secondly, more effective management measures can be taken for behaviors such as indiscriminate parking and occupation of fire escapes, such as blacklist system and special rectification; Finally, if someone does park indiscriminately and does not correct it after dissuasion, you can ask the traffic management department or fire department to assist in special rectification.
But in any case, as a service organization serving owners, the property should protect the interests of all owners and treat them equally. Unilateral "one-size-fits-all" management will only lead to an increase in internal contradictions in the community, resulting in the confrontation between the property and the owner! The property management company should put itself in the right position, and the property is for the owner, not for the owner.