Introduction.
Whether Ukraine succeeds or fails in the war in Ukraine has a lot to do with the U.S. rescue plan, because it is necessary to protect its rights and interests. Zelensky also realized that without the help of the United States, Ukraine would have no choice but to fail. This article will discuss in detail the help provided by the United States to Ukraine and Zelensky's attitude and behavior in this regard.
For Ukraine, the rescue of Western countries is of great practical significance.
The delay in the U.S. rescue operation has put Ukraine under enormous pressure in the war. The retreat from the Avdeyevka region is yet another example of Ukrainian forces being forced to retreat without receiving new rescues, which puts the region in a situation of partial collapse. United States ** Biden accused the US Congress of not passing the aid bill for Ukraine as soon as possible, and stressed the importance of the United States' help to Ukraine. This rescue was not only an actual action, but also affected the morale and psychological state of the Russian army. For Ukrainian soldiers and civilians, the United States is not only materially helping, but also a psychological dependence, and once this dependence disappears, Ukraine's ability to resist will become weaker and weaker.
1. The effect of the aid.
The U.S. help to Ukraine has multiple meanings, from first-class equipment to policy support, which are interlocking and interlocking. The Ukrainian military has maintained a high level of combat capability in the course of its fight against Russia, and has defended Ukraine's interests and position around the world. However, delays in rescue operations and uncertainty about the situation have put Ukraine in a difficult position, as can be seen from the war in Avdeyevka.
2. The helplessness of Uzlensky (Uzbekistan).
Ukraine's Zelensky has publicly stated that there is no "Plan B", which means that Ukraine's growth and security depend on the help of Western countries. Although a "Plan B" has been proposed, Ukraine's domestic finances and forces are not enough to support a protracted conflict with Russia. Zelensky is very firm on this, he knows that Ukraine lacks a flexible, comprehensive "Plan B" and that failure is inevitable.
Zelensky's dilemma.
Zelensky is faced with the question of whether the United States can help, and there is some deviation in his views and public opinion. Opinion polls in Ukraine show that many Ukrainians want peace talks with Russia in search of a lasting solution. But Zelensky, after accepting the request of Western countries, still adheres to a path of war, both to get help and to protect his own rights and interests.
1. Powerlessness in the face of reality.
Zelenskyy faces a dilemma: he must rely on the help of Western countries to stabilize his country, but it also deprives him of the possibility of negotiating with Russia. His actions are limited by U.S. support, so he's happy to interview Fox as a new wave of U.S. bailouts comes, hoping to gain more support from the Republican Party and its supporters.
2. The work done to solicit assistance.
Zelensky's approach made him unwilling to admit defeat easily, and he still had the idea of getting new help from the United States. However, the problem he faced was how to maintain the stability of the country and win the public opinion at home and abroad in the midst of constant war. While Zelenskyy has struggled to get the word across through news outlets like Fox, it's unclear whether the arrival of aid supplies will make a difference to Ukraine's future.
b.Limitations and status of assistance.
Although the United States has bailed out Ukraine extensively, it has not helped Ukraine get out of the basic problems it faces. In the space of almost two years, the United States has crossed the line drawn by Russia, but Ukraine still has not won a significant victory in a real war. Now, hesitant Republicans are recognizing Americans' weary of the rescue operations, and they want to know what those rescues mean for Ukraine.
1. Restrictions on aid.
The rescue that has been done has helped to alleviate the situation in Ukraine, but it has not helped the situation in Ukraine in any way. This also reflects that in the new aid bill for Ukraine, the Democrats can only delay the inevitable defeat by relying too much on bailouts. Despite the new bailouts, the challenges facing Ukraine remain daunting.
2. Political self-interest and national dilemma.
In the bailout process of the United States, politicians tend to focus on their own interests rather than the big picture. This makes bailouts much less effective and becomes a political game for their own benefit. In this case, the future of Ukraine remains uncertain, and the rescue is only providing temporary support.
Brief summary. The U.S. rescue is very critical for Ukraine, and Zelensky's so-called non-"Plan B" has also made him aware of the difficult situation Ukraine is in. However, for Ukraine, helping is not the only way, so instead of relying too much on external powers, it is better to achieve a peaceful solution in Ukraine through internal development. Ukraine's interference in its own interests and restrictions on its ability to rescue are telling us that only with its own strength and wisdom can we get out of the current predicament and achieve long-term stability.