I always see many people saying that they have created millions of lists for the company, and the year-end bonus is only tens of thousands.
First of all, turnover is not profit, the profit of the general company is about 15% up and down a few points, there are super patented science and technology enterprises or blue ocean industries can reach 30%, and the physical manufacturing industry will be lower. Secondly, 20% corporate income tax is deducted from profits. You calculate how much profit it will bring.
Secondly, these millions of performance are not created by you alone and then to the company, the company provides a platform, provides you with the basic salary when you don't make a single order, and the most important company provides you with goods for sale.
There is a cooperative relationship between you and the company, you show your talent, the company delivers products, and you cooperate with each other to win the order. You can build the machine ordered by others at home, deliver all the services, you can take it all, the problem is not that you can't solve it.
Finally, the remuneration of workers has nothing to do with value creation, but only with job competitors. It's not the key to how much performance you have, it's how many people can achieve your performance? For example, if you say that you can sell 1000w of BMW a year, it sounds not small, and there are many people who can sell 1000w, what to do, if you can easily reach this number by grabbing an experienced salesman, then your salary will not be done, just depend on how much money they want to do. (This is purely an example and does not understand the specific sales situation).
As a commodity, the labor force of a worker, like other ordinary commodities, fluctuates with the supply and demand relationship of the market.
The same is true for companies, such as IELTS classes, the cost of hiring a teacher is very high, and the value that can be brought to the child's future is infinite, how can you sign up for the course have to give you 100w.
But the peers will do 50w, and half of the ** will take orders, then the market ** is 50w, either do it at a loss or don't do it.
Some clothing companies would rather burn the clothes than donate them, because doing charity also requires a lot of costs, a lot of labor costs, logistics costs, management costs, and if you accidentally have internal corruption, then netizens will not let you go, the cost of doing good deeds is too great, it is better to quietly burn the inventory.
Part-time workers have nothing to do with more work. If you want to be linked to profits, it is a shareholder, either join in the entrepreneurial stage to share the risk, or invest in the future with multiple premium funds** shares after it is formed.
Raise their scarcity and fight for bargaining power.
In the current situation in the talent market, the market value of professionals is getting lower and lower. If the full score of the professional degree is 100, then those with a score of more than 95 are still popular, and this part is generally a doctor with real skills. People with a degree of professionalism of 80-95 points are more professional than professional, and a Harvard doctor has 100 water masters; On the other hand, I have a "higher education" and don't look down on many jobs. On the contrary, it is not as good as some people who are very daring to do it with a professional degree of less than 80 points.
In fact, 24 years later, the first chain is generally overcapacity, and the most bottleneck link lies in customer acquisition and conversion, which is the most important part to cultivate.
Everyone used to look down on sales because 30 years ago, the domestic production capacity was insufficient, and a large number of skilled workers were needed, which was intentionally guided.
Workplace, entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship, confession, and money.