Implementation of the Teacher Withdrawal Mechanism Why don't civil servants implement the withdrawal mechanism?
The implementation of the teacher opt-out system has puzzled many teachers: why can't civil servants implement the opt-out system?
In recent years,"Retire without promotion"The system has caused a lot of controversy in colleges and universities, but it is now rapidly spreading to primary and secondary schools across the country. Recently, it has been announced across the country"Retirement options", most teachers no longer enjoy it"Iron rice bowl"。
In November last year, the Ningbo Municipal Bureau of Education announced the "Implementation Measures for the Withdrawal Mechanism of Teachers in Ningbo", proposing to dismiss teachers who are unqualified, incompetent or have teacher ethics problems. Although it has not yet been implemented in some districts and counties, school principals have begun to intimidate teachers, saying that they are preparing for a teacher withdrawal system, and those who do not do well will be dismissed.
Front-line teachers are not particularly surprised by teacher pensions. However, many teachers do not understand why there is no pension scheme for state civil servants. After all, everyone is a civil servant, so what's the difference?
First of all, if they are both national civil servants and belong to the same state institutions, why are there differences in the treatment of teachers and civil servants? Although the current performance of teachers is not as good as that of State civil servants, teachers should enjoy the same rights and obligations as State civil servants because they are also State institutions.
Why is there no separation system for civil servants? Isn't the social status of teachers as high as that of civil servants? If a teacher violates the ethics of the teacher, the civil servant will not violate the ethics of the teacher? Teachers can pass exams, but civil servants can't? If this is the case, then all teachers should be dismissed on their own initiative.
We cannot treat teachers as a special group and blame them for all problems, because this will not only break the hearts of teachers, but will also have a negative impact on the future of education.
Secondly, in the current situation, no teacher will give up easily. Will they still be able to lie down? A lot of people think that today's teachers don't take their jobs seriously, that it's an insecure profession, and that we should give them a sense of crisis and make them willing to leave. But they apparently don't know what schools are like today.
It can be said that in such a tense environment, teachers want to be lazy and dare not be lazy.
Teachers can never relax while working. Even elementary school teachers work more than 10 hours a day, and secondary school teachers work more than 12 hours a day, how can they sleep soundly at home?
Teachers do not dare to give up on the strict judgment of the promotion rate easily. In today's schools, the progression rate is very important. After each final exam, the principal conducts a rigorous evaluation of teachers based on student performance. What's more, this kind of assessment is linked to teachers' bonuses and grades, and teachers who do not do well in the test have to reflect on themselves. How can you have the courage to stand by in such an environment?
Chinese children are the hardest to learn, and Chinese teachers are the hardest to teach. Their work is hard, but they are absolutely competent and responsible. Wouldn't the conscience of the most difficult teachers hurt when they were dismissed?
Third, once the teacher dismissal system is implemented, it will bring many problems to the education sector. Many people only see the benefits of dismissing teachers, but ignore the fact that dismissing teachers is still immature at this stage.
First of all, the salary of the teaching profession is not high, and many people choose the teaching profession because of its stability. While the salary of a teacher looks good, it is not high compared to other professions. He looked at his teachers and saw that most of them were girls, and there were very few boys. Moreover, most people are looking for a place to live, and if the teachers are gone, who will be a teacher? The quality of teachers will definitely decline.
Second, the system is aimed at front-line teachers, which is very unfair. At present, university examinations in Hong Kong are aimed at front-line teachers, but the examinations of famous universities are aimed at front-line teachers, which means that front-line teachers will certainly be eliminated. Is it justice that the most diligent and hard-working frontline teacher is rejected like this ? Which other front-line teachers dare to work for a long time?
What happens to the principal after a teacher resigns? Now the focus is on front-line teachers, so does the principal also have an exit mechanism? Are all principals truly qualified? What if a principal abuses his power to retaliate against a teacher? There is an exit mechanism for excellent teachers and principals.
The most important thing in education is stability. If teachers are in a state of anxiety for a long time, it is not conducive to the development of education and teaching. Let alone let the excellent teachers who work quietly be respected in the slightest.
Finally, we must realize that not only the educational circles but also all walks of life should also establish a withdrawal mechanism, instead of focusing on teachers. At present, many people focus their attention on teachers, as if the whole society is the only profession of teachers that has problems, and teachers are derelict in their duties, which is a very bad idea. The status of teachers is so low that everyone can point fingers at teachers and blame them.
Which company does not have unethical practices? Which sector is free of unethical behavior? And it's not just teachers who do it, are they? If we want to change this trend, it must be implemented in society as a whole, especially civil servants, who must take the initiative to do so, rather than always looking at teachers with suspicion.
In short, education is the foundation of the nation, and teachers are the hope of the nation. We should cultivate a good atmosphere of respecting teachers and valuing education, instead of blindly looking for fault with teachers and taking the rectification of teachers as a top priority. We should not let all activities start with teachers, and the whole society should look at our teachers in a different way.
Everything we do comes from the Internet and has no malicious or malicious intent. The information and theories contained in the text are taken from the Internet, and the content contained therein should not be construed as the author's agreement with the laws, regulations, opinions, behaviors and truthfulness of the text. The author of this article is not responsible for the above content or related matters, and does not assume any direct or indirect responsibility.