Taiwan's Taiwanese sugar plum blossom pork turmoil is intensifying, and the issue of clenbuterol before the Spring Festival has plunged the whole society into unease. On the 21st, the "Food and Drug Administration" of the Taiwan authorities held a meeting of food safety experts, attended by Fu Qionghui, director of the Food Safety Department of Taichung City, and other representatives. What is even more remarkable is that the two representatives, who were once hailed as model public servants in Taiwan, were questioned by the outside world in the process of fulfilling their duties. This episode shocked the society and caused widespread discussion.
The Taichung City Health Bureau confirmed the situation on the 22nd, although it did not disclose the details, but it was enough to cause public concern about the safety of Taiwan sugar plum blossom pork. Ke Wenzhe's statement in this incident added fuel to the fire, he said that if the whole batch of pork could not be detected, and only one piece was problematic, it must be laboratory contamination. The remark sparked more voices questioning the lab.
However, Taichung City Health Director Zeng Zizhan emphasized in an interview on the 22nd that scientific verification requires conclusive evidence. Four experts inspected the FESD's laboratory and unanimously agreed that there was no problem with the process, while the experts denied the possibility of laboratory contamination. However, the Taiwan authorities quickly came to the conclusion that it was a laboratory contamination, which aroused dissatisfaction and suspicion in society.
On the issue of food safety, Taiwan's public opinion organization held a party caucus consultation yesterday afternoon, and after a heated discussion of 30 minutes, the representatives of all party caucuses finally reached a consensus and decided to invite Chen Chien-jen, the person in charge of Taiwan's administrative organ, to lead the responsible person of the relevant "ministry committee" to report on the project on 23 July. During the negotiations, the green and white parties quarreled endlessly and engaged in fierce confrontations. ** Ke Jianming, the general director of the Youth League, angrily reprimanded Huang Guochang, the general director of the People's Party, for not understanding the rules of procedure, and bluntly said that he would first get a reading club and then participate in the debate. Huang Guochang responded that he has made his position clear many times and hopes to strengthen the supervision of food safety issues by adding a meeting.
In the end, Han Kuo-yu, the head of Taiwan's public opinion organization, ruled that all party groups agreed to invite Chen Chien-jen to lead the responsible person of the "ministry meeting" to attend as an observer on February 23 and put forward a special report on the general review of the 8-year administration. The number of questioners was recommended by the Kuomintang caucus 7, the ** caucus 7 and the People's Party 1. During the whole process, there were fierce debates among all parties, and the public looked forward to learning more about the truth about food safety issues through the project report.
This incident is not only related to food safety in Taiwan, but also involves the trust of society in public institutions. In the midst of this exciting food safety turmoil, people are looking forward to seeing more truths revealed and those responsible held accountable. Food safety is a matter of concern to thousands of households, and we hope that Taiwan can properly solve the problem and give the people a safe food environment. Through this incident, we hope to promote the improvement of relevant systems and protect the health and rights of the public.