If there is a real job in China, the first thing that comes to everyone's mind must be a civil servant.
This is also the reason why civil servants are widely criticizedIron rice bowl, lifelong, no exit mechanism.
There is no survival of the fittest, so many people in the system are lazy and lazy at work, and they go to work to fish.
Therefore, some people suggest that civil servants should be eliminated from the last position like enterprises, dismiss 10% of civil servants every year, and warn the remaining 90% of people to work hard and perform hard next year, otherwise you will be on the list of 10% next year.
To explain here, "last place elimination" refers to a system that eliminates employees who are at the bottom of their job performance. It is said that this system originated from the vitality curve created by Jack Welch of General Electric Company (GE) in the United States, also known as the 10% elimination rate rule.
At GE, managers at all levels are subjected to a rigorous annual evaluation of their department's employees, resulting in 10 percent of C-category lagging employees, and often the worst-performing employees have to leave. Many private enterprises in China are implementing this system.
So what will happen if the last place is eliminated in the system?
The first will appearPower rent-seeking, the power in the hands of the people in charge of the assessment is infinitely magnified. No one wants to be laid off, and some people will use all kinds of means or connections to provide some benefits or benefits to the leaders in exchange for maintaining the establishment, and corruption will arise.
And then there'sBad money drives out good money。Think about this picture, the leader of the unit said that this year, we will be given three indicators for the elimination of the last place, and you will study who is appropriate. As a result, those who are usually silent and boring are eliminated, and those who have a close relationship with the leader stay.
Since then, all units have been the only secretary and the first to look forward, and everyone is studying how to please the leaders, rather than how to do a good job.
And then there will beConfusion in the assessment。It is difficult to say between the evaluation standards of civil servants. Because a lot of the work of civil servants cannot be quantified. There is no way to quantify his work, no way to quantify the content of his work, and no way to quantify the results of his work.
In the enterprise, the assessment of salesmen is very simple, sorted according to the size of sales, and the bottom one in a row is dismissed as "not good at work".
The new ** company is assessed by the number of reads and likes, and the consulting company is assessed by the number of service enterprises.
Civil servants are unlikely to be able to quantify it so precisely. Because in addition to the regular work that has to be done every year, a large part of the work of civil servants is doneOther tasks assigned by the leader, mainly depends on the decision-making and deployment of the superiors, as well as whether there is a major emergency managed by the department where the ** is located.
Another very critical issue is that the implementation of the elimination of the last position cannot only be carried out at the grassroots level, and the leadership will also be eliminated.
The assessment of leaders cannot be refined and quantified. Many of them are in meetings, research, and scheduling, and they can't be assessed by the length and number of meetings.
At the same time, the elimination of the last place also broke the way the system operated. We cultivate cadres so that they think that they will work in the system for a long time and have a chance to move up. This is the expectation of the cadres.
The elimination of the last place is like a sword of Damocles hanging over their heads, which ruins their mentality. If there are leaders who leave every year, and the expectations are gone, they will be panicked, and they will not want to do more, but think about how to find a backer and climb the relationship.
If you take a closer look at our country's **, you will find that they have a significant characteristic, that is, they have rich leadership experience. In China, the experience of performing duties in multiple places and positions is a political capital. Some cadres with development potential are usually placed in departments and positions with high spatial turnover rate for training and reserve.
As long as he didn't do anything that violated discipline and law, the organization would not give up on him, at most he would hide for a period of time and then come out to do things.
These are the reasons why it is not possible to implement the elimination of the last place in the system.
Therefore, the elimination of the last position seems fair and just, but it does not work in the system. Once implemented, those small-town problem-solvers who only know how to work hard, don't know how to slip around and shoot horses, can't dance with long sleeves, have no connections, no background, and no connections, become the first victims. Politicalization is inevitable.