The United States may introduce new rules to restrict Apple and prevent pressure on iPhone users!
A lot of people say that Apple, an American company, has always been a bit tough.
For example, under the guise of environmental protection, the charging head is no longer used, and as a result, the sales of the charging head continue to rise; For another example, in terms of Apple's iOS environmental protection, Apple's commission fee is so high that many App software manufacturers are miserable, and even caused a storm of downgrade opposition so that they are forced to downgrade to a newer version of Apple's iOS system. For example, Apple either doesn't allow third-party repair parts, or restricts some features so that iPhone users can only choose from** accessories.
That's just part of the story.
But on the other hand, the EU has settled the one for Apple"Financial issues"。That said, Apple will have to use the TypeC standard charging interface. In time, another one from Apple"Money"It will also be cut off. This time it's Oregon.
According to publicly available information, the state is preparing legislation requiring Apple not to implement"Part matching"Limit. In short, the parts matching restrictions imposed by Apple force users not to use third-party repair services or use non-genuine parts for self-repair. The state believes that this practice is unacceptable.
It is not surprising that such legislation has been or is being proposed. In a way, by restricting components, Apple is in"Forced"iPhone users use Apple's repair solutions. Because once you start using third-party parts, Apple will not hesitate to limit certain features. For example, until now, features such as Face ID technology have been limited when battery components are not repaired using Apple channels.
However, the repair process of Apple's path is more complicated. In addition, repairs** are much higher, and Apple's repair threshold for old iPhone users is not low.
That's why Oregon decided to go after Apple.
However, this new regulation has not yet been officially announced. The reason for this is that Apple is strictly opposed, and for good reason. According to a senior manager on Apple's security engineering team, the regulations were introduced to facilitate repairs and protect devices and data.
There is reason to believe that Apple's claims about data security and privacy may upset the other side. After all, the third-party details that put the data at risk could put all the blame on Apple, which they don't want to do. However, in my opinion, they don't want to cut themselves off anymore, so they have complete control over the rationale behind iPhone product repairs.
Their head-to-head is likely to yield a less positive outcome. On the one hand, the limitation of Apple's repair is obvious, that is, it is completely controlled by itself, criticized by iPhone users, and Apple will come to this point sooner or later. On the other hand, iPhone users in the US and EU markets will not condone Apple either, as they are currently discussing the feasibility of this law, and even if Apple is against it, they will find a way to enforce it.
And if there is a breakthrough in Apple repair, it will not be long before Apple will be able to gain a firm foothold in the global market, especially in the EU market. So, when will the necessary legislation against Apple be passed in the mainland market? Feel free to comment, like, and share on this topic! And share freely!