Before reading the article, please click "Follow" to facilitate discussion and sharing. Authors will live up to expectations and create better content on time and in quantity.
Wen Xiaojie said hot things
Editor Xiaojie said hot things
You can't miss it! Last year's election of NATO secretary general set off a political storm in the West, and the truth behind the scenes is staggering. It is reported that former British Defense Secretary Wallace Zeng"Self-nomination"Wanted to take over, but in the end it was the United States**"One vote no"The reason behind it is astonishing.
At the end of November last year, the Washington Post** US Secretary of State Antony Blinken strongly recommended European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen as NATO Secretary General. The resume of the former German defense minister seems to be a perfect match, but things are not so simple.
It is striking that German Chancellor Olaf Scholz vehemently opposed von der Leyen's takeover as NATO Secretary General, calling it so"You can't let the German Democrats teach the Democrats to do it"。This opposition has raised a lot of concern: what exactly is Germany's position?
Some analysts believe that the reason why Scholz opposes it is not only because of von der Leyen's status as a Democrat in Germany, but also because of concerns about the relationship between Europe and the United States. As Germany's leader in the European Union, Scholz understands that if von der Leyen takes over as NATO secretary general, the relationship between Europe and the United States may be more closely linked.
Von der Leyen has shown a strong anti-Russian attitude during her presidency of the European Commission, which has led to increased sanctions against Russia. However, Scholz believes that this is not in the interests of Germany, and that anti-Russian policy may be one of the reasons for the cancellation of Germany's defense spending program.
Behind Scholz's opposition may also be the protection of European autonomy. He may have feared that von der Leyen's hardline approach could cause Europe to lose its independence from NATO. In the end, in order to reach a compromise, NATO decided to continue Stoltenberg's fourth term as secretary general.
The inside story of this scene allows us to see the political game within NATO. American"One vote no"and Scholz's fierce opposition all show the dilemma that NATO faces in choosing its leaders. Does this mean that there are greater divisions within NATO, which deserve to be delved in**.
Although Stoltenberg remains secretary-general, von der Leyen's nomination and Scholz's opposition may have planted a seed within NATO. In the future, it is worth paying close attention to how NATO will respond to the challenges of Russia, China and other countries, as well as the role it will play in Europe-US relations.
The story behind the election of NATO Secretary-General gives us a glimpse into the complexities of international politics. Whether Scholz's concerns truly represent the voice of Europe, and whether von der Leyen's controversial policies will affect NATO's future, are questions that require deep consideration. NATO's choice will have a direct impact on the international order and security landscape, and the revelation of this election may be just the tip of the iceberg.
Newbie Assistance Program What is your opinion on the election of NATO Secretary General? Scholz's opposition, American"One vote no"How do you think the political game within NATO will evolve? Share your views and share the complex situation of international politics together!