In today's information** era, the Internet can instantly amplify and spread personal behavior to thousands of households.
Recently, a passenger had an argument with the attendant in the train dining car over the dining issue, like a thousand waves, which set off huge waves on the Internet.
The passenger, who had purchased a meal ticket out of exhaustion, had a heated confrontation with the flight attendant because he felt that the meal and conversation of the flight attendant disturbed his rest.
His behavior triggered a series of chain reactions, which not only affected the majority of netizens, but also touched the sensitive nerves of ** and public issues.
Cause a heated discussion! 
The man was on train K511 and originally only had a station ticket. Because of the fatigue after the long journey, he chose to pay an extra 30 yuan in exchange for a chance to take a break in the dining car. He may have imagined a quiet space to rest, however, the reality is that his break coincides with the flight attendants' shift meal time. The man didn't seem to anticipate this, and his dissatisfaction was out of control. During the communication with the flight attendant, the dispute between the two sides escalated, and the man insisted that the flight attendant should not eat in the dining car, and recorded ** during the confrontation and uploaded it to the Internet, in an attempt to use the power of the public to support his views.
Let's take a closer look at the online repercussions after this ** was circulated.
Different from the support that the man expected, his behavior caused widespread disgust among netizens.
They believe that the dining car is a place to provide meals for passengers, and the flight attendants also have the right to eat, and the man's request seems unreasonable and selfish.
On the Internet, the controversy not only did not bring sympathy to the man, but instead made him the target of public criticism and was labeled as "cyber violence".
Especially the sentence he blurted outWaiters are not eligible to dine here.
Clearly contrary to normal values!
Even though he was widely criticized in the comment section, the man still went his own way and started a heated debate with netizens.
He insisted that he had paid for the right to rest and therefore should not be disturbed in any way.
Netizens generally believe that although the rapid response of the Guangzhou Railway Group seems to be for the sake of passengers on the surface, it ignores the complexity and fairness of the entire incident, and is easy to promote the bad social atmosphere that "those who make trouble can be satisfied".
In the heated discussion and doubts of netizens, Guangzhou Railway Group had to close the evaluation in an attempt to avoid the further spread of the problem.
As the incident continued to ferment, CCTV published a commentary on February 23, making a profound analysis of the key issues in the incident.
CCTV pointed out that when passengers choose to rest in the dining car, they should foresee possible noise interference, rather than complaining afterwards; At the same time, he criticized the man's behavior of choosing to shoot and upload ** without any communication, believing that this extreme approach would only escalate the conflict.
In addition, the central radio network also raised questions about the handling of the Guangzhou Railway, believing that the punishment of the crew in the absence of a clear basis is undoubtedly an overly hasty decision made under the pressure of the public.
Under the high pressure of **, the man finally chose to apologize, but his apology did not seem to be out of inner repentance, but a helpless choice under pressure.
He apologized for his actions, but while apologizing, he tried to justify himself, claiming that he reacted under emotional agitation and threats.
And insist that you are right.
The apology was not directly addressed to the flight attendants, but to netizens, so it did not appear sincere.
This incident is not only a controversy about train services, but also a profound reflection on individual behavior, social responsibility, and online culture.
The popularity of smartphones has indeed brought us convenience, but at the same time, it has also brought with it the risk of abuse.
While enjoying the convenience brought by science and technology, we should also assume the corresponding social responsibility, learn to communicate and express rationally, and avoid the continuous expansion of contradictions.