In the era of social **, the reversal of the rights and wrongs of controversial events is nothing new. It is even possible to reverse the reversal, reverse the reversal, reverse the reversal, and push it down in turn. Because compared with the complexity of isolated events themselves, the preconceived ideas of emotional judgments and the infinite cycle of value judgments are more complicated.
In a sense, compared with the "Teacher Zhang incident" itself, the energy of onlookers and the enthusiasm of extending the event are more grand. We often say that morality belongs to morality, and law belongs to law, but in the era of social **, in addition to the core event, there are many people who eat the bowl of rice of the core event traffic.
In the past, people always said that eating human blood steamed buns was not authentic, but now it seems that compared with eating human blood steamed buns, the "professional **" who manipulates the enthusiasm of eating human blood steamed buns is more hateful. For example, in the follow-up to the "Teacher Zhang Incident", suddenly all major social ** platforms began to criticize "a group of female anchors who pretended to be Teacher Zhang to start a live broadcast", and they still "have pictures and truths".
It is no exaggeration to say that the ** that has been spread and the empirical theory of past Internet celebrities rubbing traffic, most netizens are still serious. So what's going on with the "Teacher Zhang incident", netizens will not investigate it for the time being, but begin to investigate the "fake Teacher Zhang" who "scolded first and then bit and then rubbed". To be honest, if it weren't for someone breaking the hustle and bustle, "Teacher Zhang" seems to have thanked netizens for their righteous actions.
But the problem is that there is no such thing as pretending to be "Teacher Zhang" for a long time, but because of the follow-up of "professional", the non-professional arrangement has become the first Mars. Therefore, when a well-known ** person began to pop the bubble, he found that the "professional**" was "running naked". It is no exaggeration to say that this kind of "streaking" is not the first time, but this time it is even less about "media morality".
Some people may say, what about "media morality"? Don't even have a face! Yes, since entering the era of social **, the traditional sense of "professional**" is indeed becoming more and more "weak". There are some reasons that are inconvenient to talk about, but as for the professional cross-validation technology, as a "professional**", try not to lose it. Because if you lose even this bit of craftsmanship, you deserve to be "weak" to the end.
Therefore, in the follow-up to the "Teacher Zhang incident", the "professional" deserved to be scolded. We must admit that no matter how "weak" the "professional" is, the basic leading role is still there. Therefore, it is naturally easy to form a consensus on the assertion that "many accounts pretend to be Mr. Zhang to open live broadcasts without a bottom line and rub traffic".
You must know that non-professional ** will engage in topics again, as long as "professional**" does not end up with comments, it is basically a local wave, some people believe but will not go to the point of consensus, that is to say, "professional**" in addition to the leading role, but also the role of positive audio-visual. But now it seems that this role will become weaker and weaker, because there are too many shouts of "wolf coming", and there are too many "witch hunts", and netizens are also annoyed.
Speaking of which, some people may say, what else can we do besides scolding "professional**"? Yes, in the era of social **, facing all kinds of impacts of right and wrong all the time, wave after wave of emotional judgments, and value judgments have their own reasons, as if the controversial incident is just a fuse, except for detonating the Internet, no one cares about the life or death of the parties.
As a result, "all bad guys" has become an alternative true portrayal of the current ** field. Take the "Teacher Zhang incident" as an example, "Teacher Zhang", "High School Student", and "Teacher Zhang's Husband", in addition to the family members who care about the real right and wrong and feel sorry for their relatives, the spectators in the ** field are more disgusting while eating melons. Some people are not addicted to the flirting screenshots that have been circulated, and they feel that there is ** to be considered the truth.
In other words, in the face of peachy news, many people prefer to watch peachy interactions rather than ethical rights and wrongs. But hypocritical human nature must pretend to be critical, so the recursive direction of reversal, reversal, and reversal appeared. In this regard, of course, most netizens don't care, after all, eating melons is such a thing, that is, it is cool if it can be cool, and it is not felt when you really examine it.
But I still have to say that eating melons is eating melons, don't be led astray by melon sellers. The reversal of the follow-up extension of the "Teacher Zhang incident" is not so much that the "professional" is too unscrupulous, but that in the era when emotional judgments and value judgments are detached from the truth in most cases, we need to restrain emotional judgments and value judgments. Because emotional judgment and value judgment regardless of the truth means that "right prevails over everything", and at the same time, it also means that "misjudgment" will destroy everything and drown everything.