Starting from the reduction of the burden on teachers on the People's Online Review, teachers still have a burden, which is called "ineffective training"!
In recent years, teachers have been asked to take on additional tasks in addition to their own duties. These additional tasks put a lot of pressure on teachers and seriously affect their teaching work. In order to solve this problem, the state promulgated the "Several Opinions on Reducing the Burden of Primary and Secondary School Teachers and Further Creating a Good Environment for Education and Teaching", aiming to comprehensively reduce the burden of primary and secondary school teachers and create a good education and teaching environment.
Recently, People's Daily Online published an article titled "People's Daily Online Three Commentaries on "Teacher Burden Reduction": Who understands the unbearable burden? The article lists the many unreasonable burdens borne by teachers, showing the weight of teachers' pressure.
However, education authorities may not be aware that there is also an unreasonable burden, namely "ineffective training". This kind of training is nominally aimed at improving the professionalism of teachers, but in reality it is an ineffective waste of time. The existence of such training places an additional burden on teachers without providing them with substantial help.
When it comes to teacher training, it should be reasonable and necessary from a common sense point of view. As a teacher, it is natural to constantly update your knowledge, ideas, professional standards, and keep pace with the times to adapt to the ever-changing educational environment. Otherwise, it may be out of touch with the times and difficult to teach.
Therefore, for the training, teachers should actively participate in it, study carefully, and expect to gain something. However, the reality is often far from ideal. I believe that the vast majority of primary and secondary school teachers share a similar feeling that much of the training is ineffective and merely formalistic.
The so-called "ineffective training" includes two aspects: first, the quality of training content is uneven and lacks practicability; Second, the training method is improper, resulting in poor results.
For example, the first year or two of the popular information technology 20 training, although many teachers have participated in and passed, but how much change has it actually brought? To be honest, I only remember "20", the rest of the word has little to gain.
While some of the training content is indeed valuable and serious learning is worth it, the over-reliance on online training has been boring for teachers. With more than one class a day, time is often tight and cannot be arranged smoothly, so you can only cope with it in a hurry with little effect.
For the training of teachers, three aspects should be comprehensively considered: practicability, not affecting the normal teaching order, and appropriate arrangement.
First of all, the training content should be practical and mainly focus on improving the level of classroom teaching. Hands-on training formats such as observation courses are more popular, as they provide more practical classroom support than expert lectures, and are more valuable by combining theory and practice.
Second, training activities should not interfere with the normal order of teaching and learning. For this reason, you can consider scheduling the training during the holidays, such as a few days before the holidays, and organize an appropriate amount of training activities to ensure that the teaching work is not disrupted.
Finally, even if training is conducted within the normal teaching time frame, the number of times should be controlled to avoid unduly interfering with the normal work of the teacher. At present, the frequency of training is too common, from the provincial level to the city and county level, the activities are frequent, and the live broadcast format is even more boring for teachers. Therefore, it is important to organize training activities in such a way as to ensure that they do not have an undue impact on teaching and learning.
The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.