Han Kuo-yu, this name has caused countless controversies and concerns in Taiwan.
He used to be the mayor of Kaohsiung and later ran for the leadership of Taiwan, losing to Tsai Ing-wen.
In January this year, he was successfully elected head of Taiwan's legislature and became the top leader of the Kuomintang.
However, on his first working day after taking office, he was accused of "not going to work". Is this true?
According to reports, after Han Kuo-yu was elected as the head of Taiwan's legislature, on his first day of work on the 2nd, he was accused of "not going to work".
The reason was that there was no meeting of the legislature that day, and Han Kuo-yu did not appear in the office, but went to a hotel in Taipei City and held a closed-door meeting with the top brass of the Kuomintang and some "legislators".
This news soon triggered the bombardment of the "black Korean industrial chain", who believed that Han Kuo-yu was evading responsibility, not performing his duties, not respecting the status and functions of the legislature, not caring about Taiwan's people's livelihood and security, and only caring about his own selfish interests and political ambitions.
However, this accusation is unfair and unobjective, and the absence of a meeting on the 2nd does not mean that there is no work.
The head of the legislature has a wide range of tasks, not only presiding over meetings, but also handling various documents, coordinating parties, formulating policies, responding to emergencies, and so on.
Han Kuo-yu's closed-door meeting at the hotel was to discuss the future development of the Kuomintang, unify internal opinions, and formulate countermeasures, which was also one of the areas of his work.
Han Kuo-yu did not ignore the importance of the legislature, and immediately after he was elected, he said that he would respect and cooperate with the operation of the legislature, communicate and consult with various political parties and "legislators," promote the reform and efficiency of the legislature, and contribute to Taiwan's well-being and progress.
He also said that he would regularly report to the legislature and accept the questioning and supervision of the "legislators," and would not be like some people, who would only talk empty words on television and would not appear in the legislature.
Therefore, on the first working day after taking office, Han Kuo-yu did not "fail to show up for work", but was fulfilling his duties to prepare for the future of the Kuomintang and Taiwan.
This is the performance of a responsible and visionary leader, not a politician who is evasive and lazy.
Han Kuo-yu held a closed-door meeting at the hotel, which sparked speculation and speculation among some people, forming a so-called "black Korean industry chain" in an attempt to attack his reputation.
Some people speculated whether he was plotting an ulterior conspiracy, or colluding with certain forces, and even linked him to the hotel owner, claiming that he was advertising the hotel for personal gain.
In fact, Han Kuo-yu's main purpose at the meeting was to discuss issues related to the KMT's major strategies and principles, the party's life and death, and Taiwan's future.
Han Kuo-yu chose to hold the meeting in the hotel to ensure the smooth and safe operation of the meeting and to safeguard the interests of the Kuomintang and Taiwan, rather than to conceal it.
The purpose of the closed-door meeting was to enhance unity and cohesion within the KMT.
Han Kuo-yu needs to communicate and coordinate with the top brass and "legislators" to resolve internal differences, unify thoughts and actions, and enhance the KMT's combat effectiveness.
In order to create a quiet, comfortable and harmonious environment, Han Yu chose to hold the meeting in a hotel.
The decision was intended to emphasize the unity of the KMT, not to involve any wrongdoing.
By holding a closed-door meeting at the hotel, Han Kuo-yu aimed to show the image and level of the Kuomintang.
He tried to show his demeanor as the supreme leader, emphasize the party's responsibility and responsibility as an opposition party, and convey his confidence and determination in Taiwan.
This required a high-end, elegant, tasteful venue, so the choice to hold the meeting in the hotel was not for advertising or personal gain, but to show the high-level image of the Kuomintang.
Han's first working day in office sparked two very different reactions.
Supporters are proud and gratified by his performance, believing that he is a capable and courageous leader who can lead the Kuomintang to regain its strength, create conditions for Taiwan's peace and prosperity, and safeguard Taiwan's democracy and freedom.
They expressed their support and trust in Han Kuo-yu's work and were full of hope for his future.
Opponents expressed anger and dissatisfaction with Han Kuo-yu, believing that he was an incompetent and shameless politician who would only deceive and exploit KMT supporters, endanger Taiwan's security and development, serve the interests of the mainland, and trample on Taiwan's rule of law and human rights.
This kind of disagreement reflects the ** and antagonism of Taiwanese society, as well as people's confusion and confusion.
The same person and one thing, but there are completely different views, this is because the values and cognition of the Taiwanese people have been manipulated and misled by certain forces, information and speech have been distorted and confused, and values have been kidnapped.
These forces continue to smear and attack Han Kuo-yu through the so-called "black Korean industrial chain", and use the ** network to carry out endless attacks, in an attempt to prevent his rise, destroy his image, make him an enemy of the Taiwanese people, and the Kuomintang become an outlier in society.
Han Kuo-yu's first working day sparked concern and controversy.
In this incident, supporters saw his leadership potential and expected him to lead the KMT to new heights.
However, opponents expressed dissatisfaction with his behavior, showing the ** of Taiwanese society.
In view of this, we need to look at political events rationally and not be over-interpreted and instigated.
Only through reasonable discussion can Taiwan find a better direction for development. February** Dynamic Incentive Program