According to the "Reference News" and other ** reports, on the 27th, the United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting on North Korea's recent satellite launch, at which all parties had a heated discussion on the matter, and the representatives of the United States and the DPRK scolded each other on the spot, and the meeting ended in vain and did not adopt any statement or resolution.
U.S. representative Linda Thomas-Greenfield attacked North Korea at the meeting, claiming that U.S. military exercises with Japan and South Korea on the peninsula were "defensive" and that North Korea had no reason to launch missiles. The representative of the United States also claimed that the United States is ready to "talk unconditionally" with the DPRK, and that the DPRK should accept this offer.
The DPRK did not buy the "lesson-style demands" of the United States, and the country's representative Jin Xing made a strong counterattack against the United States, pointing out that the United States is a real threat to the peninsula. He also claimed that there are currently more than 5,000 satellites in operation in space, and that no other country has interfered with the launch of satellites. The DPRK representative also pointed out that since the United States possesses nuclear and other advanced technologies, the DPRK also has the right to develop its own technological means.
As permanent members of the Security Council, China and Russia also do not support the US position, and in view of the US provocative behavior in the peninsula region, China and Russia also call on all parties to exercise restraint and address the concerns of all parties in a balanced manner. In the end, no consensus was reached and no document was issued.
As a matter of fact, China has expressed its position on the DPRK satellite issue many times recently. ** Reiterate the hope that all parties will be calm and restrained and resolve the issue through dialogue and consultation. The Chinese side expressed its willingness to continue to play a constructive role in promoting peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula, but also pointed out that there are deep-seated reasons for the deterioration of the situation on the Korean Peninsula.
China's statement is actually a fair remark. The United States knows very well why the situation on the Korean Peninsula has become the way it is now. Before the DPRK launched the satellite, it was pointed out that the United States has recently frequently dispatched aircraft carriers and bombers to the peninsula, and these actions are undoubtedly stimulating the sensitive nerves of the DPRK. How can North Korea sit idly by in the face of the US nuclear threat.
And the United States feels that it is problematic for North Korea to launch satellites, so what does the United States mean by its own spy satellites? Last year, the United States launched its sixth "space-based infrared system" (SBIRS) satellite, a satellite constellation worth up to $1 billion, which will be used to monitor the missile launch activities of China, Russia, and other countries in an all-round way. Since the beginning of this year, the United States has successively launched the "Silent Buck" satellite, a satellite constellation mainly used to track Chinese and Russian spacecraft. A large part of the satellites currently in space are American, including various reconnaissance satellites.
The United States feels that it has an advantage in space, so it is also unashamed to propose to develop "space", that is, to attack the satellites of other countries, or to directly strike on the ground. In this process, the United States has instigated the "threat" of China and Russia, and on the other hand, it has acted recklessly and unrestrained.
It is obviously impossible for the United States to do so many evil things on its own, and then want to act as the "embodiment of justice" in the world. So the United States should stop blaming others, if the United States thinks that the satellite launched by the DPRK is a "threat", then the United States itself has sent so many spy satellites, and even engaged in "space warfare", what kind of mentality does the United States have?