Surfing the Internet, I can often see netizens commenting heartbreakingly: xxx is very good, but it's a pity that the butt is crooked.
For example: Mo Yan is very literate, but unfortunately his butt is crooked; Hu Shi is a contribution, but it's a pity that his butt is crooked.
At first glance, I thought it was an online consultation by a doctor who diagnosed "crooked ass syndrome", but later I realized that it was originally a matter of position.
If you want them to judge Mo Yan's magical realism from a literary point of view, they will immediately be dumbfounded.
When you can't evaluate a person's level of professionalism, turn to judge the position and shout: your ass is crooked! The person concerned is usually speechless because he knows that he is no longer discussing right and wrong.
The metaphor of the position as the ass is indeed a very vivid metaphor, but what exactly does the "position" refer to, standing to **, standing in**, under what circumstances is it considered a "crooked ass", no experts have said this question, this is a vague area.
In the TV series "Towards the Republic", before Cixi went to war with the world, she organized a court discussion, and the patriotic minister was resolute and indignant, vowing to fight to the death with the foreigners, and Cixi was very satisfied with it.
At this time, two ministers suddenly stood up and said that they could not fight, that the Boxers were a rabble, and that no matter how many Boxers there were, they were only live targets for foreign guns and artillery. The atmosphere of high morale was destroyed by these two people at once.
What they both said was undoubtedly true. Gangyi also knew it in his heart, but he turned his mind and angrily denounced them as "** thieves".
TV series are not history, here it must be a deduction. But we are no strangers to similar episodes.
The words of the two ministers were not exciting, but they were true.
If we only consider the position, everything that the Qing Dynasty did was right, and if we did not consider the facts (killing innocent foreigners), the disaster caused would only be greater.
There is a widely circulated joke that "donates a salary to Taiwan, a year to the United States, and a life to Japan." Naturally, there is no problem with the stance and the patriotic feelings are admirable.
If you ask him to donate money to someone begging on the side of the road, you will make him close his eyes again when you open his eyes to the facts.
Of course, it is not denied that there are indeed cases of talking with money or stepping on a sewing machine to post. But that doesn't mean that people who don't agree with you have a problem.
It is easy to criticize others from the moral high ground, but it takes logic and knowledge to debate calmly.
In the past, judging a person would also be based on a person's origin, and the ass may be crooked at birth.
Yu Luoke once gave his life because he opposed such a view.
Knowledge itself is objective, but people can't be exhaustive, and sometimes it's one-sided, so different people need to tell their knowledge.
The more knowledge you have, the closer you are to objective truth.
Mo Yan said: People determine their position by right and wrong, and slaves determine right and wrong by their position.
Only those who have an independent personality have their own thoughts, and the truth is the standpoint.
The slave takes the master's thought as his thought and the master's position as his position, and never asks whether right or wrong is right or wrong.
Always talk about things from a standpoint, in essence, I still don't believe that there are universally recognized standards in this world, I don't believe that 1+1 equals 2, I feel that Copernicus, who put forward the "heliocentric theory", is blasphemous, and I feel that people who point out the backwardness of the Qing Dynasty are **thieves.
If so, the more positive the butt, the farther away from the truth.