【Interview Questions】Nowadays, many universities offer "unconventional courses", such as: love courses, card playing classes, ** classes, wilderness survival courses, etc. Some people think that the university curriculum should be rigorous, while others think that it meets the different needs of students and has innovative thinking, which is a useful attempt to reform the university curriculum. What do you think?
Political analysis] This question belongs to the topic of double views on social phenomena, and the question stem is based on the social background of "unconventional courses" offered by many universities, leading to different points of view, let us talk about our views. When answering, we should first clarify our own views, such as opening special courses to meet the different needs of students and improve the quality of teaching, and we can have an inclusive attitude towards this, and at the same time, we should also analyze the problems that may be caused by opening special courses, and finally explain how to make special courses better and better. Next, a specific analysis will be carried out in combination with the topic.
Examination point 1: "There are many universities that offer 'unconventional courses', such as: love courses, card playing courses, ** courses, wilderness survival courses, etc.".
At the beginning of this question, some characteristic courses offered by some universities are listed, and the reason why they are called "unconventional courses" is because in the traditional cognition, college courses are very professional, systematic, and knowledge-based, while courses such as love courses and card playing courses are too life-oriented and entertaining.
Question 2: "Some people think that the university curriculum should be rigorous, and some people think that it meets the different needs of students and has innovative thinking, which is a useful attempt to reform the university curriculum."
The social phenomenon of "unconventional courses" in colleges and universities has given rise to two different types of views. Some people think that the opening of these courses is not rigorous enough, which may make students lose their minds and abandon their studies, and the curriculum is always a rigorous and professional work, if a course is opened on a whim, but there is not enough teacher support and solid content output, the course will eventually become a "water class". This concern is not unfounded. Others believe that the new courses are of great significance, and from the perspective of stimulating students' interest, such courses can attract students' attention and make teaching fun. From the perspective of learning skills, through love classes, ** classes, etc., students can learn some necessary skills in work and life, and receive the effect of improving their comprehensive ability; From the perspective of colleges and universities, the establishment of these courses can optimize the curriculum and improve the quality of education.
Examination point 3: "What do you think".
For two-point of view questions, we can choose to support one of the ideas or both. As far as this question is concerned, the starting point of the opponent is to make students learn better and the school is better educated, and it is considered from the possible problems of opening special courses, while the prosessive side is based on the advantages of special courses and takes into account the positive impact of the curriculum on students and schools, and the two are not contradictory. Therefore, we can have an inclusive attitude, analyze and explain the positive significance and possible problems of the characteristic curriculum, and finally talk about the countermeasures from how to make the curriculum design more reasonable.
Therefore, the answer idea of this question is: first, show attitude and tolerate it; secondly, analyze the significance and explain the advantages; Again, point out the problem and analyze it objectively; Finally, talk about how to optimize the curriculum and teach better.