Recently, many people have been scolding Bai Yansong.
Bai Yansong was scolded, and it was not a recent thing. Since I started being scolded, it seems that I have been scolded more and more often.
Bai Yansong felt that he was wronged, and many of them were also misinterpreted with emotions and out of context. Incomprehension of a moderator's position and attitude.
Bai Yansong was very relieved and said a sentence: If you scold Bai Yansong, it can make everyone feel more comfortable, and it can be regarded as helping everyone.
In fact, what I am most afraid of is this kind of relief. Scolding is equivalent to not scolding.
He doesn't think that anything about himself has quietly changed, he doesn't know if he still has a social conscience for what he is saying now, and he doesn't know if he is bearing the same responsibility and morality as always.
I used to like Bai Yansong very much, just like we all liked "Focus Interview" in the past. Dare to speak the truth, dare to speak for the people, is profound, know the living conditions of the people, and will think from the perspective of the people. Now the gray-haired Bai Yansong is full of controversy.
When a person dares to speak, he is saying what he really wants to say in his heart. A person has to say that he is speaking something that is demarcated by his status. If a person dares to speak and fails to say the root cause, he has gone astray. What Bai Yansong said made people feel like a joke.
Some time ago, Bai Yansong had a conversation with experts in a talk show, which aroused the indignation of many netizens. It is said that he has stayed in the "big pants" for too long and has not gone out, and he does not know the suffering of the world.
Bai Yansong asked: The common people have money, but he doesn't dare to spend it, and he doesn't want to spend it. What do you think about the reluctance of ordinary people to spend money?
The expert answers: I want to give everyone a confidence. Use policy promotion and some reform measures to improve the consumption environment, so that they have money to dare to spend. The second is to create new supplies so that people can spend their money.
The most vivid summary of the dialogue between these two people that I have heard is two lines of poetry, two yellow orioles singing green willows, and a line of egrets in the blue sky.
This "Huang Li" is the "performative" interaction between Bai Yansong and the expert, and this "Bai Lu" is the common people who "do not want to consume".
A lot of ordinary people don't have a lot of money. Those who have no money must be ordinary people, and most of the people who have money are not ordinary people.
Bai Yansong was scolded, and it was he who gave an assumption that the common people were very rich. The problem that cannot be solved is that in today's situation when the country's economy is so depressed, it is unwilling to spend money and contribute to the economy.
The common people have money and do not spend" is like a trumped-up "crime" against conscience.
Don't say that the common people don't have money in their hands, just like the common people have money in their hands, he doesn't dare to spend it. Thinking about the three melons and two dates in the pockets of the common people is ill-intentioned.
The water in the tank, if there is no water coming in, will soon bottom out, and no one knows when the water will stop flowing. If you can ensure a steady stream of water coming in, then there is no need to think about whether you should use the water in the tank, it will naturally overflow.
Don't reason with the common people, it will only make people feel annoying. People who are not short of money to spend can't understand why people who lack money to spend don't spend money.
How can you not see the essence of the problem? It's not that the people are unwilling to spend, but that the people's income will naturally reduce their spending. The Chinese people have paid for the rapid economic development of the past in China.
The root cause of not daring to spend money is not to stimulate the people, find some reasons, and coax the people to spend money, but to let the people get more money through their own labor. If you have more money, you will naturally consider taking it out and spending it.
Consumption is a naturally promoted phenomenon, although it is related to people's consumption consciousness and concept, but it is more determined by income.
Talking about "how to solve the problem of people not daring to spend money in 2004" is not only ridiculous, but also a little brazen.
What is the socio-economic economy for? Social economy is to let the people consume and spend more? What is the purpose of encouraging people to have the courage to consume?
It is undeniable that when the economy is in a downturn, a vicious circle of declining revenues and expenditures will be formed. Therefore, it is more necessary to have a strong heart to speed up the entire blood circulation, and the life of the market will naturally be alive.
Even if you give money to the people, it won't work. If a person's heart is not working, no amount of blood transfused is useless. The core is to improve social security, education, pension and medical care for all, and promote the economy with social security.
It's easy to get money, and it's easy to spend it; The money is not easy to get, so I am reluctant to spend it. When people feel that money is no longer so urgent or important to them, they will exchange it for what they want.