U.S. influence in the Middle East is declining.
Recently, the US military campaign against the Houthis has failed to receive international support, and Western countries such as Italy, France, and Spain have said that they will not join the US operation. This indicates that the influence of the United States in the Middle East is relatively weak, declining compared to the past.
First of all, the US military's attack on the Houthis has caused controversy in the international community. The Houthis are considered a powerful force in the region, and the lack of widespread support for the U.S. unilateral action demonstrates the isolated nature of its actions in the Middle East.
Secondly, the attitude of Italy, France, Spain and other countries shows the caution of Western allies in the actions of the United States. This may reflect a misgiving, a military solution, or an antipathy to the excessive involvement of the United States in the political situation in the Middle East.
Finally, the U.S. influence around the world is relatively weak, declining compared to the past. With the changing international landscape and the rise of other countries, the United States is no longer the only superpower, and the feasibility and legitimacy of its unilateralist actions are being challenged.
Putin ** made important progress in the Caucasus.
Russia reached an agreement with Abkhazia to establish a naval base in Ochamchira, which effectively protected the interests of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. This move not only increased Russia's influence in the Caucasus, but also stabilized the political situation.
First of all, Russia's strategic initiatives in the Caucasus demonstrate its deep concern for regional security. The creation of a naval base allows Russia to more effectively safeguard the interests of the Black Sea Fleet and ensure an advantageous position in geopolitical competition.
Secondly, the agreement between Russia and Abkhazia means important progress in regional affairs. This not only established a strong military presence for Russia in the Caucasus, but also laid a solid foundation for its political influence in the region.
Ukraine** is facing a dilemma.
For Ukraine**, Russia's establishment of a naval base in the Caucasus is bad news. Ukraine's previous efforts to strike the Black Sea Fleet were defused, and the cessation of U.S. military aid to Ukraine put it in a difficult position.
First, Russia's military initiatives in the Caucasus make it difficult for Ukraine to launch an effective strike against the Black Sea Fleet. Tensions in the region can make it difficult for Ukraine to effectively defend it militarily
Second, the cessation of U.S. military aid to Ukraine has made Ukraine even more isolated. Amid tensions with Russia, Ukraine desperately needs international support, and the U.S. decision could put it in an even more difficult geopolitical position.
China's position on the Ukraine crisis.
China has taken a sensible stance in the Ukraine crisis to avoid blindly supporting Ukraine. In a pluralistic world, the United States cannot influence the decisions of other countries.
First of all, China's position shows its maturity and calmness in international affairs. Avoiding blind support for Ukraine and standing on the side of fairness and peace will help China maintain neutrality and balance in the international community.
Second, in a pluralistic world, the United States cannot influence the decisions of other countries. China's position emphasizes the principle of multilateralism and equality in international relations, and calls on all parties to stop the fighting, which is conducive to alleviating the crisis.
Finally, China should continue to call on the international community to work together to resolve the Ukraine crisis through dialogue and consultation. China can play a more active role in the international arena and make more contributions to regional peace and stability.