Objectively describing the current social phenomenon is not to deny the progress of modern society, let alone to "bring rhythm"; In today's era of highly developed information, no one is an "authority" on various social phenomena, let alone dares to lightly say what is right and what is wrong. Keep in mind the teachings of the ancients: take history as a lesson to learn from the rise and fall, take people as a lesson to know the gains and losses, and take copper as a lesson to correct the clothes.
A quasi-first-tier city industrial park has been in operation for several years, and there are more than 600 enterprises registered in the park, and part of the well-known reason for the more than 600 registered enterprises is "shell" or "zombie" enterprises, and about one-third of the enterprises actually have teams and normal operations in the park, and the number of employees working in the industrial park is about 10,000 (including supporting catering, supermarket and supermarket employees); When making the annual summary report materials, the requirements of the leaders of the industrial park are very clear: the industrial park has no less than 18,000 industrial talents, more than 80% of the registered enterprises have been put into operation, and of course, there are more clear and quantitative requirements ......
This is a real event that has been experienced, according to this "script" to develop downward, to the data released to the society and the public, the number of enterprises in the park, the number of talents, the "high probability" will be more, after all, it is reported layer by layer, and different levels will more or less give "extra weight".
This phenomenon is not news in today's society, let alone an event, and it has become a norm in certain environments and assessment requirements; If there are small partners who have experienced the data to the relevant data and statistics departments, they should have experienced that the data is issued from the top down, and when it comes to the most basic units to fill in the data, sometimes it is "open-book homework", and the questions and answers are ready-made, and they can only be filled in.
This phenomenon should be said to be the norm at present. A lot of data is outsourced by third parties or even layers, and sometimes the objectivity of the data formed by the so-called "data model and analysis" is already problematic; Most of the audit data is mainly based on "listening to reports", and the real situation is not well grasped, so there is no way to ask "real questions". The end result is predictable.
The great man has a point: without investigation, there is no voice. Allowing people who don't have an investigation to make decisions creates room for "fooling", and for many people, truthfulness and objectivity are a real luxury.