What you can t get on the battlefield, don t think about at the negotiating table

In 1945, after China's victory in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, Chiang Kai-shek, who was far away in Chongqing, ordered the Eighth Route Army to stand by, and at the same time, with the assistance of American aircraft, frantically transported the troops hoarded in the rear to the front line to snatch the fruits of victory.

In order to buy time for his army, Chiang Kai-shek set up a Hongmen banquet and pretended to invite *** to Chongqing"Discuss the great plan for peace" and "whoever does not come to peace talks will be a national sinner."

Fools can see that Chiang Kai-shek has bad intentions, so most people are against *** going to Chongqing.

Chiang Kai-shek, but he has a black history of detaining Zhang Xueliang.

In order to occupy the high ground and gain public support, he decided to hold Chiang Kai-shek's Hongmen banquet for a while.

Before leaving, **say to *** and others:"For the invasion of Chiang's army, you must fight hard, and the better you fight on the front line, the safer we will be in Chongqing."

On August 25, 1945, ** and his party arrived in Chongqing.

At the negotiating table, the Kuomintang demanded that the Communists unilaterally disband the army and at the same time abandon land reform.

The Communist Party demanded that either all the armed forces be disbanded or none at all, and as for the land reform, it must be continued.

The differences between the KMT and the CCP are extremely huge, and it can be said that at the negotiating table, each side has its own words, and there is no possibility of reaching an agreement.

On September 10, Chiang Kai-shek ordered Yan Xishan to attack the liberated areas in a big way.

In just one month, Yan Xishan's entire 11 elite divisions were completely annihilated by Liu Deng's army.

On the afternoon of October 10, the Kuomintang was forced to accept the armistice agreement, and signed the Double Tenth Agreement with Chiang Kai-shek.

The signing of this agreement made Chiang Kai-shek, who tore up the agreement half a year later and launched a full-scale civil war, completely defeated and greatly discouraged the people.

In just three years, the Nanjing ** Mansion has been planted with a red flag.

The first Sino-US negotiations

The first negotiations between China and the United States were in North Korea.

In June 1950, the Korean War broke out, and China sent troops against the entire coalition led by the United States.

After a year of fighting, the two sides decided to negotiate, and in July 1951, the two sides sat down at the negotiating table.

Both sides agreed to a ceasefire, but disagreed on the price of the ceasefire.

The Chinese side proposed that the area under its current actual control, that is, the 38th parallel, be the demarcation line between the two sides.

The US side proposed that the Chinese side withdraw 38 to 68 kilometers in the area under its current actual control as the military demarcation line for the armistice.

Can you understand the brain circuitry of the American side? Anyway, I can't understand that for this impasse in the negotiations, ** gave the famous three arguments for the front-line negotiating delegations to do this.

In August 1951, in order to force the Chinese side to accept the US proposal, the joint ** launched a full-scale offensive.

Since the Chinese side is unwilling to give it, then I will grab it.

According to the battle plan, this US assault should advance the front by 50 kilometers.

After two months of onslaught, the Americans, killed and wounded, found themselves advancing only 2 kilometers of the front.

In October 1951, the Americans sat down at the negotiating table again and agreed to serve as the military dividing line between the two sides in the area under their actual control at the time of the signing.

Compared with the first deadlock in the negotiations, this negotiation has achieved substantive results and breakthroughs.

So is the war over? No.

Since the area under actual control is the military dividing line, and I can advance 2 kilometers with a single attack, why should I not launch another attack?

As a result, the Americans just dragged their feet and did not sign, and the ground forces continued to attack in a big way.

After nearly two more years of fighting, on July 27, 1953, the United States finally agreed to sign an armistice.

Why did you agree to an armistice, because the military demarcation line in the final agreement was actually moved one kilometer south compared to the demarcation line originally proposed by the Chinese side...

The United States fought for 2 years and suffered heavy losses,The actual control area is getting smaller and smaller, so it's better to sign it from the beginning.

Thus, in Panmunjom, China, the United States and the DPRK finally signed the "Korean Armistice Agreement".

If the squadron does not hold its own position on the battlefield, the United States will not bother to pay attention to you.

Sino-US war.

According to Xinhua News Agency, the two sides mainly differed in the negotiations

1. The U.S. has increased tariffs so far, and Americans hope to keep them after the agreement is reached.

This request is the most unreasonable, both sides have reached an agreement, and you still have to keep your tariffs while asking the Chinese side to remove them.

Excuse me, why, in that case, why did I sign a contract with you?

This request is extremely unreasonable and bizarre, but the Americans are indeed asking for it...

On March 20, 2019, Trump told ** that after the ** agreement came into effect, the US tariffs will continue for a long time, and the US agriculture will receive large orders as a result, Trump hinted that these orders are the fruits of the ** war.

Can we agree to such conditions? If such conditions can be agreed,It is better to reduce the salary of all Chinese by 300 yuan per person and give it directly to the Americans to spend.

2. The U.S. side believes that China's commitment to purchase is too small and hopes to expand it significantly.

It is not a problem to buy more American goods, China has a bunch of foreign exchange in its hands. The crux of the matter is that the United States does not sell the high-precision and sophisticated products that China needs, but the low-grade products that China is willing to sell to China, and China has a huge industrial system and jobs.

The United States intends to support the U.S. agriculture and textile industry by allowing China to purchase large quantities of U.S. agricultural and textile products.

These two industries have very low added value but absorb a lot of jobs.

If China were to buy such products in large quantities, the farmers would lose their jobs, the textile workers would lose their jobs, and the sudden increase in the number of job-seekers would create a cascading wave of unemployment that would eventually ripple over to all other industries.

Trump's insistence on increasing the purchase quota for low-grade products is to transfer jobs to the United States, while the Chinese delegation insists on not agreeing to this condition because it wants to keep jobs in China.

Are you willing to lose your job? If you wish, you agree to this condition.

3. The United States wants China to publicly admit that it has infringed on U.S. interests and stolen U.S. intellectual property.

This is even more nonsense, the country also has face, which is using China's face as a stepping stone to Trump's campaign.

If this condition is agreed, believe me, Trump, who has tasted the sweetness, will immediately begin to prepare for the second round of exploitation and exploitation of China, and the living standards of ordinary Chinese will fall again.

We often talk about losing power and humiliating the countryDo you know what it means to humiliate the country? This is called humiliation.

So,If you want to talk, you will talk, and if you want to fight, you will fight. It is often said that no matter what conditions the United States proposes, we will agree to it, and the matter will not settle down.

This is a big mistake, if that's the caseWhen Yuan Shikai and Japan signed the Sino-Japanese "Twenty-one Articles" that humiliated the country, why did you scold others? Didn't Yuan Shikai also agree to Japan's conditions in order to calm the situation?

Moreover, even Yuan Shikai was forced to agree to the conditions of the Japanese after fighting for 5 months, and some people were more active than Yuan Shikai in terms of **.

Historical difficulties.

Is this ** negotiation difficult, it is indeed very difficult, but compared with the storms that China has encountered before, it is really just a small matter.

Back in 1990, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States launched comprehensive sanctions against China due to ideological differences.

At that time, China did not have high technology and a mature industrial system, so it could only export some low-grade products in exchange for meager foreign exchange, and the United States was China's largest country.

China's low-grade products, due to the lack of market competitiveness and irreplaceability, profits are extremely thin, a little fluctuation can wipe out profits, so China is highly dependent on the United States' most-favored-nation treatment.

At that time, the most favored nation treatment of the United States to China was reviewed every year, so every year, China had to send people to the United States to do lobbying work and take the initiative to spend money to purchase American products to win over American political forces.

It was not until 2001 that China joined the WTO that such days would come to an end.

Throughout the 90s, China's inflation rate was as high as double digits, and in 1994 it was as high as 21%, and the people of the country were crazy about everything they could see.

Throughout the 90s, bad debts were rampant in Chinese banks, with non-performing loans as high as 40%, and the entire Chinese financial system was on the verge of collapse.

Throughout the 90s, the restructuring of state-owned enterprises led to the layoff of tens of millions of workers, social unrest, and anxiety in various places.

China was able to survive then, and of course it can survive today.

When the United States launched the Iraq War in 1991, Iraq was the fourth largest military in the world and even superior to China in terms of conventional military power.

On TV, the Chinese people have seen an unimaginable modern high-tech warAmerica's **fighter planes and American precision guidance** have made what should have been a tragic war one-sided.

Outside the line of sight, Iraq's tanks, radars, and airfields were destroyed by missiles point to point, and there was not even a human figure to be seen, and the war was over.

At that time, the squadron was still practicing hard to fight bayonets.

The huge technological gap has forced China to endure humiliation and rashly provoke a war, which is irresponsible to the Chinese.

After more than ten years of lying on the back, China's Liaoning has been launched, China's precision guidance ** has been released, and China's J-20 has gone to the sky.

At this time, China dared to speak to the United States in a tough manner.

But China has never fought a war that it is uncertain about, and when China dares to say that "if it wants to talk, it will talk, and if it wants to fight," it must be ready to win.

What should we do.

According to historical experience, if the United States will benefit more if it continues to fight the first war, then no matter how outrageous the conditions China accepts, the Americans will offer a higher price.

Therefore, you must beat the Americans hard, and when the continuous war begins to damage the interests of the United States, the Americans will be really willing to sign a contract with you.

When the two sides are deadlocked, they will sincerely conduct peace negotiations, and if one side retreats, only the alliance under the city will be left for him.

And in the difficult period of mutual stalemate, for the sake of a happy life in the future, so that every Chinese can live the same life as an AmericanWe should work together to overcome this difficult time.

If you are a business owner, then you should shoulder your social responsibility during this period, and the business is not just about making money.

In this difficult period, enterprises should lay off fewer employees, and if they have to lay off, try to lay off those employees with high salaries and other incomes at home, so as to make the society as stable as possible.

After surviving this period, when the economy is big, your business will also benefit from it.

If you are a stockholder, then during this period, you must be resolutely bullish, do not easily sell short naked, Trump often uses the sharp drop in A-shares as his own political achievements to brag.

* Stabilized, the delegations that negotiate on the front line will be more confident in their talks.

Warren Buffett, an American, once said: No one can succeed by shorting their homeland.

If you are an ordinary person, then do your job well during this time, create more wealth for the society, and in chatting with relatives and friends, you should resolutely oppose the US hegemonic policies pursued by Trump that harm China's interests.

Trump said that he represents the United States, he is the best of Americans, and his words and deeds are to consider and fight for the interests of Americans.

And you, who are Chinese, do not need to consider your interests,He would be very happy if sacrificing you would increase the American's monthly salary by a hundred dollars, and he would only regret what had happened to you.

The Chinese are weak, if they are not united, why do you want to live a rich life like the Americans, you know, the earth's resources are limited.