List of high-quality authors Hello everyone, I am an astronomical mother.
Here is a parenting knowledge base with content, depth, and temperature, click to follow me!
Recently, I saw a question, if the child grows up and flies away like an eagle and will not provide for you in old age, will you have a child?
If this question is placed in ancient times, I think most people will probably say, "Isn't it just to provide for me when I have a child?"
But in modern society, there are different answers to this question.
I looked at the 1800 responses below and in general there were 5 different ideas.
The most upvoted answers
Most people agree with the statement of netizen Sister Gardenia.
She said: I gave birth to a child just to let him grow up and fly away!
As long as he takes the right path, what does he like to do, he always revolves around me, what's the matter?
My children are not a tool for the elderly.
I gave birth to him because of love. I want to experience raising children, it's my thing.
He was actually with me when he was younger.
Of course, I hope that he will often come home to see him when he is an adult, and he can be with him from time to time, but I will not force him to treat me after **, after all, he is an independent person.
The most heart-wrenching answer
Netizen Xiaoliu said:
My cub is now 6 years old, and I didn't think about asking her to give me a pension. In terms of the current situation, when she grows up, she will not break the law, borrow money, or gnaw on the elderly, she will be physically and mentally healthy, and she will be able to support herself, even if I have raised her very successfully. As a parent, you have to work hard to earn a pension and don't trouble your children, and keep each other decent, this life is enough!
In fact, many older urban residents are unable to rely on their children, and even have to pay to support their children's small families.
The most sober answer
Netizen Xiaozhong said:
Even if the child does not provide for himself, he will still choose to give birth.
Maybe it's because we're still young and don't feel the need for retirement, or maybe we'll need it when we're older.
But before and when I had a child, until now, I didn't have the idea of letting him retire in his old age.
Nowadays, there are many young people who go out of the province to live abroad, and the earth has become a village, can they expect to retire in other places?
The most selfless answer
Netizen Ziluo said:
My answer is: I would choose to be born!
Because the purpose of raising children cannot be to hold the mentality of raising children to prevent old age, this concept has long been outdated. We raise a child for the sake of giving and appreciation, we pay for him all our lives, care for him, care for him, rejoice because of his joy, grieve because of his sorrow, and be proud of his achievements......
The love of this world.
Other loves are born for the sake of being together.
Only the love of parents and children is born for separation.
The most realistic answer
Netizens love to say:
Originally, it is extremely difficult for ordinary people to raise children, and if they are raised, they will disappear in the sea of people, and if they have a choice, they will definitely not raise them. When people are old, you can't do the work in the field, the autumn harvest is over, the first thing you contact must be your children, not to spend money to find someone, your wife is sick and needs to be sent to the hospital, the first contact must be the children, and the first thing to take care of in the hospital is the children, not others, because when the doctor needs to sign and negotiate the ** plan, the first thing is the children, and the old man will not ask, he may not understand. This is anti-aging.
After reading this question, I thought for a long time, if it were me, I would still choose to have a child.
When the child was young, I had him by my company and placed affection on him, in fact, many times, although I really paid, I was very happy in my heart.
He smiled, and my heart melted.
He would call out to his mother and throw himself into my arms.
When I ate something delicious at school, I would wrap it in a handkerchief and let me taste it with anticipation on the way out of school.
When I was tired, he would hold his little fist and help me beat my back.
He did a bad job in the exam and was very frustrated, so I would help him analyze it, take a walk together, and take a break.
If he does the test, I will give him a thumbs up and see that his tail is going to reach the sky, which is very funny.
I will dig sand and go to the playground with him, but in fact, he is not accompanying me to relive my childhood?
There are times when he makes me angry, and I want to beat him up so much that I jump to my feet, but isn't this another experience in life?
When I think of old age, although it has not yet arrived, I will understand it when I look at my parents.
In fact, the child is also another self, he has his own life, his own family, the children of our ordinary family, he will also have hardships in life, so I can understand his difficulties, and I don't want to increase his burden.
I can only work myself, roll myself, and let myself have the ability to provide for myself in the future.
If he can, come to the hospital to help sign it, there is a ** during the New Year's holiday, and when I am tired, I will go home for a meal and a break, and I will be very satisfied.
If your children are adults, fly away like eagles and don't provide for your old age, will you choose to have children?
What do you think about this, please leave a message in the comment area.
The next issue will be more exciting!
The case is ** on the Internet, and the infringement must be deleted.