A reasonable nation has the ability and can fight.
Unreasonable nations are incapable, harm each other, and be beaten.
What kind of people are unreasonable?
I have always been a beaten nation, and I always think from the perspective of the weak in my heart, and my ancestors are always powerful in my mouth!
For example, China is the world's factory and the world's largest productivity, and if the universal application of public market revitalization and the issuance of universal stored value can not only benefit Chinese, but also activate Chinese innovation, but Chinese intellectuals are invisible, because according to American standards: China's GDP ranks second. In the same way, the Chinese public is also not allowed to share, because "they" are not worthy of reasoning with enterprises owned by the whole people, "they" are ordinary people, and the people talk and share indiscriminately, will they not be arrested by black and white impermanence.
Another example, smart phones are the mother of the platform, all software is parasitic on the consumer's smart phone, consumers should unite to build a universal application public market, to undertake future consumption, which will go to the process of distribution, finance, will be the current Internet platform to ask the consumer class to co-opt, the reason is that the public market will make Chinese manufacturing do not need advertising, and the current Internet platform is precisely relying on advertising to survive. If consumers are reasonable and share with themselves, the platforms will be honest immediately, and the capitalists will be honest immediately. But the objective situation is that "you" are the head of being bullied, not worthy of self-interest, only worthy of being bullied, bullied by various platforms, bullied by banks, bullied by educational institutions, bullied by hospitals, bullied by urban management....In your real brain database, the Chinese nation has been an ancient civilization that has been bullied since ancient times, and every Chinese has never been a "proletariat" who cannot defend his personal life and property, even the emperor Lao Tzu.
The psychological proletariat has no security fulcrum, no ability to see, no personality and conscience, and is not worthy of sharing with self-interest. But it is necessary to give their personality and conscience to them in history by selectively recording history and memory, so that every "proletariat" will be convinced that there must be something visible among them, there must be courage among them, and there must be goodness among them....So, I'm waiting for them first!
In the third example, someone pays "her" to inspire "her" and make "her" gain respect, but "she" proves that "she" is unworthy. Psychologically proletariat, everything can be violated, including the soul. Self-interest is a natural ability of human beings, and when someone hires you to be the uncrowned king, you are inspired to discover that you have lost your innate ability (i.e., soul) of self-interest! Not only do you not have gratitude, but you also argue with your patron about quantity and quality, which can only say that you are born proletarian and do not need a soul.
Hint: You only inherit the perspective of the weak (the producer, the girl), and the consumer (the God of the sure win, boy) perspective comes from the Internet age. Therefore, the "she" in the text does not refer to gender, but to the non-cooperation of the weak perspective, like the Indians.