There are many people who say that Tesla's pure vision solution plus millimeter-wave radar solution is really vulnerable. Some people use the terms "illiterate" and "mentally retarded" to describe this program, and the person who says such things may not know enough about technology themselves, and may even be mentally retarded.
The reason why Tesla chose the no-map solution is because there are many solutions for advanced intelligent driving, and the pure vision solution and the lidar solution have not yet been determined. Many people generally question the purely visual solution, and even accuse it of being like a toddler. However, Tesla's vision solutions have been constantly iterating and evolving, from the initial planar 3D imaging to the current more and more simplified, even involving the speed, angle, distance and altitude of hardware perception.
Tesla's radar perception has been upgraded from speed, angle, and distance in the past to speed, angle, distance, and altitude now, which is an important hardware upgrade. However, many people seem to ignore Tesla's ongoing simplification move, which is a danger that cannot be ignored. If the streets are full of lidar, will it lead to laser pollution and harm to people's retina?
In fact, Tesla's vision-only approach is constantly evolving. From planar 3D imaging to more simplified solutions, Tesla has been pursuing more efficient intelligent driving systems. At the same time, the physical and mechanical stability of traditional LiDAR modules needs to be verified, and there is a lifetime limit of several thousand hours.
Some people may say that the program is more secure and reliable, but we really can't do it. Engineers at companies such as Huawei, Dahua and Hikvision are almost bald due to the technical route of program development. The process of learning and optimizing program solutions is very long and energy-intensive, and it is far from being as simple as everyone thinks.
Finally, objectively speaking, lidar technology is not very advanced, but because our vision solutions are not mature enough at the moment, we have no choice. It took Dr. Li Feifei 5 years to identify 50 million samples before establishing a basic sample bank. This shows the complexity of the visual scheme.
Finally, I hope you will recognize the reality. It's not that we don't want to choose a program solution, it's that we really can't do it. Tesla's FSD is respectable, but in the mouths of some, it is degraded to nothing. Please look at technological development rationally and understand the truth. If you understand my point, please give it a thumbs up.
Finally, I recommend the three most worthy new energy vehicle brands: Huawei has initially demonstrated its potential, Tesla as the largest potential stock, and BYD's Eye of the Gods, which is the indisputable TOP3 of new energy intelligent driving.