The recent housing reform may eventually develop into a variety of scenarios, with the focus on whether the industry can be successfully transferred to backward areas and the periphery of urban agglomerations. Here's a rich, structured answer to this question and the related knowledge development.
1.State-owned enterprises promote the transfer:State-owned enterprises (SOEs) are likely to be the main force driving housing reform. In the process of relocation, state-owned enterprises consume the housing inventory in the far urban areas and some urban agglomerations through the construction of affordable housing. This kind of effort helps to form a consensus and drives private enterprises to follow suit with cost considerations. The transfer of state-owned enterprises can ease the pace of manufacturing transfer to Southeast Asia, stabilize employment, and consume excess real estate capacity.
2.Alleviate the pressure of urban development:An important goal of housing reform is to alleviate the city's population density and environmental pressure. By relocating people and industries, traffic congestion can be alleviated, the urban environment can be improved, and the financial pressure on cities can be reduced. This will help solve the financial problems of some cities, reduce the gap between urban and rural areas and between urban and urban areas, stimulate consumption, and help companies retain talent.
3.Promoting coordinated regional development:The success of housing reform can also solve the problem of overcrowding and sparseness in cities. The transfer of population and industry can promote the coordinated development of regions, improve the development level of backward areas, and promote the comprehensive development of urban agglomerations. In the 13th Five-Year Plan, China has set the goal of strengthening the planning of urban agglomerations, and the 14th Five-Year Plan period to further strengthen the construction of transportation networks, which has created favorable conditions for industrial transfer and housing reform.
4.Route vs. History:It is worth mentioning that there are historical precedents for similar diversion strategies. In 1972, Japan put forward the "Theory of the Transformation of the Japanese Archipelago" in the hope of improving industrial development through urban spillover, but due to the blow of the Middle East War on Japan's oil ** in 1973, the originally planned urban spillover became Japan's spillover, thus laying the foundation for Japan's rise to become the Asian Tigers.
In short, the final development form of housing reform depends on a number of factors, and there are many possible scenarios. The promotion of state-owned enterprises, the transfer of population and industry, the coordinated development of regions and the comparison of history are all important factors affecting the development of housing reform. Further observation and evaluation are needed to determine how it will drive the transformation and development of the city. February** Dynamic Incentive Program