In the field of mobile phone photography, it has always been the focus of major brands. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra and Huawei Mate 60 Pro are the two products that many consumers will hesitate between when choosing a camera phone. This article will give you a detailed analysis of the photography capabilities of the Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra and Huawei Mate 60 Pro, and help you find the best photo artifact for you.
Before continuing to read this article, we can click on the card below to receive a consumption deduction red envelope of up to 9999 yuan, and it will be cheaper to start any product, don't miss this opportunity to save money!
1. Appearance design: each with its own characteristics, beautiful and practical.
The Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra is designed with a metal middle frame and an eco-friendly leather back shell, and is available in three colors: black, white, and olive green. The Huawei Mate 60 Pro uses the second-generation Kunlun glass, which comes in four colors: Yachuan Blue, Nannuo Purple, Baisha Silver and Yadan Black. Both phones have their own style in design, and both have high aesthetic value.
2. Hardware performance: the strength is comparable, and each has its own bright spots.
The Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen2 processor, while the Huawei Mate 60 Pro uses its own Kirin 9000s chip. Both phones feature LPDDR5X and UFS 40 storage scheme to ensure smooth running speed. In terms of heat dissipation, the Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra uses an annular cold pump cooling system, while the Huawei Mate 60 Pro has AI intelligent cooling technology. As for battery and charging, both phones perform well, with the Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra supporting 90W wired charging and 50W wireless charging, while the Huawei Mate 60 Pro supports 50W Huawei Wireless Super Fast Charging and 20W wireless reverse charging.
3. Photography strength: Xiaomi 13 Ultra is slightly better.
When it comes to taking photos, both the Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra and the Huawei Mate 60 Pro feature high-quality cameras. The Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra is equipped with a one-inch variable-aperture main camera, a Leica Pro telephoto lens, a Leica Pro ultra telephoto lens, and a Leica ultra-wide-angle lens, offering a wealth of shooting modes and features. The Huawei Mate 60 Pro has a 50-megapixel ultra-light camera, a 12-megapixel ultra-wide-angle camera, and a 48-megapixel ultra-macro telephoto camera, which also supports multiple shooting modes.
In actual shots, the Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra does a better job of taking pictures. This is mainly due to its one-inch variable-aperture main camera and the Leica brand co-branding. The large sensor size and variable aperture technology give the Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra a clear advantage in low-light conditions and landscapes. In addition, the Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra's lens module is also more advanced, bringing users higher photo quality.
Summary: The Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra is more suitable for photography enthusiasts.
Overall, both the Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra and the Huawei Mate 60 Pro excel in photography, each with its own strengths. The Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra is even better at landscape photography thanks to its one-inch variable-aperture main camera and the Leica brand's co-branding, as well as its advantages in the lens module. The Huawei Mate 60 Pro, on the other hand, is more abundant in terms of photo modes and features, making it suitable for photography enthusiasts who like to explore various shooting modes.
For photography and photography enthusiasts, both the Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra and the Huawei Mate 60 Pro are good choices. But if you're more focused on landscape photography and looking for higher image quality, then the Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra might be a better fit for you. Of course, the choice depends on your personal needs, budget and preferences.
Finally, hopefully, this article will provide you with some references when choosing a camera phone. If you find this article useful, please like, comment and ** to benefit more friends. At the same time, we also welcome the follow-up evaluation of *** to bring you more exciting content. Thank you!
New Year's goods are not closed