Recently, Zhang Xuefeng made a controversial point on his live broadcast: he strongly recommends that all universities implement entrance exams so that students can have more freedom of choice when choosing a major. For a while, there was a storm of heated discussions on social **. This view quickly sparked a huge response, with a variety of different opinions and voices emerging, both for and against.
*After posting on the web, the comment section immediately became lively!
became another senior in high school.
As the saying goes, those who have experienced it understand best.
There's really no need for this [Yun Bei].
Instead of that, it is better to relax the process associated with major switching in your freshman year
I advised him not to do it.
Overthinking.
Can you ** college students get angry.
Isn't that another form of injustice?
Now there's room to manoeuvre?
For students, the question is that the pros outweigh the cons, or does the disadvantages outweigh the pros?
Disapprove! The kids were so tired.
What I understand is.
As a self-leading writer who has been committed to the field of education for a long time, I was very surprised by Zhang Xuefeng's speech this time. After all, he has always been an "education expert" who puts practical advice and the interests of his students first.
This time, however, his position seems to have deviated from the original intent, which raises the question of whether this is out of consideration for the future of the student, or some kind of market interest?
Those who support Zhang Xuefeng believe that university entrance exams can help students gain a deeper understanding of their interests and skills, which can lead to more informed career choices.
Opponents are concerned that this type of testing could increase academic pressure on students and could lead to an uneven distribution of educational resources.
It is important to recognize that university entrance exams may provide students with a more comprehensive evaluation mechanism that will help them more precisely identify the most suitable area of their major.
However, this situation also has the potential to further increase the academic pressure on students, leaving them with a heavy academic load as early as high school. If we think of this kind of test as a kind of assessment of knowledge, then this kind of test score itself is not a real test system. Moreover, it will take time to verify whether this kind of exam can really create a better future for students.
The core goal of education should be to stimulate students' interests, strengths and all-round abilities, not just to pursue high grades or prestigious schools.
Therefore, we should be more concerned with the fairness and quality of education, and not be misled by all kinds of overly flashy reform proposals. At the same time, we need to keep a cool mind and not be influenced by the views of either side.
What are your thoughts on this?
Zhang Xuefeng suggested that the university hold an entrance exam