Food is an important issue closely related to people's livelihood, and the statistics of grain production are directly related to the food security of the people of the whole country. A recent article aboutAgricultureReports of distortion of production measurement data have attracted widespread attention. Some means of operation are indicated in the article, such as stems and leavesStrawMixed in the yield data for doping, or prepare some paddy in advance to wait in the harvester silo to exaggerate the yield figures. Data fraud at all levels has its own purpose, and scientific research institutions, seed enterprises, research institutes, etc. want to obtain more relevant subsidies; Get good political performance, obtainFarmersRecognition of seeds, which in turn leads to the sale of more seeds. However, the falsification of these data should not be done rightFarmersof planting brings further losses.
In response to the phenomenon of falsification of production measurement data, we need to understand the profit drivers behind it. Scientific research institutions, seed companies, research institutes, etc. want to obtain good data in order to obtain more relevant subsidies from the state. These subsidies can be used for further research and development to improve the quality and yield of seeds. At the same time, they want to be able to getFarmersRecognition of seeds, which in turn sells more seeds and expands market share. This kind of profit-driven behavior is very shameful, and their behavior not only harms the wholeAgricultureThe reputation of the industry is more important to makeFarmersDamaged from it.
Extra: We can't tolerate these irresponsible behaviors, because it would be rightFarmersof planting has a negative impact. These scientific research units, seed enterprises and research institutes should pay more attention to the quality and authenticity of their products, so as to get better development opportunities. At the same time, supervision should be strengthened, data fraud should be severely cracked down, and the authenticity of grain production statistics should be ensured.
Although there is a phenomenon of falsification in the measurement data, this behavior should not be confused with China's grain output statistics. China has strict norms and requirements for grain output statistics. According to the conclusion of my previous article, we can know that according to the 1.4 billion people, they consume 1 catty per dayWheator 1 cattyRiceAccording to the calculation, the annual consumption is not much different from the production. This means that our country has enough food ** to meet the needs of the people of the whole country. If the food production in our country is insufficient, then there will inevitably be people who will go hungry. In practice, however, there are no cases where people go hungry because of lack of food. Therefore, it does not make much sense to question the statistics of our country's grain production.
Additional expansion: For our country,Food securityis a vital task. ** It has always attached great importance to the statistics of grain production, and the accuracy and reliability of the data have been ensured through strict supervision and standardization. At the same time, China also ensures the rations of the people of the whole country through means such as stabilizing and controlling the amount of imports. Relative to the amount of imported grain, our country's grain production accounts for a relatively large amount, which is sufficient to meet the needs of the people of the whole country.
We do not tolerate data falsification by scientific research institutes, seed companies, research institutes, etc. for personal gain. This behavior is not only deceptive to society, but also to itFarmersHarm to interests. Scientific research institutions, seed enterprises, research institutes, etc. should face the data with an objective and truthful attitude, and constantly strive to improve the quality and yield of products, rather than obtaining temporary benefits through fraud. ** Supervision of data should be strengthened, and the punishment of data fraud should be increased, and it should be well maintainedAgricultureIndustrial environment.
Additional expansion: Data fraud is an unethical behavior, and we call on scientific research institutions, seed companies, research institutes, etc. to promote itAgricultureWhile developing science and technology, we must maintain the principles of integrity and sustainable development. Only true, accurate data can help us understand betterAgricultureThe actual situation of development provides strong support for the stability of grain output. At the same time, it is also necessary to increase efforts in supervision, establish a sound detection mechanism, ensure the authenticity and accuracy of data, and crack down on data fraud and maintenance in accordance with the lawAgricultureGood order of the industry.
The existence of data falsification has a certain impact on grain output statistics, but China has strict statistical requirements and norms, and such a problem will not be solvedFood securityGenerate a substantial threat. However, we can't ignore the profit drivers behind this behavior, and we also need to take steps to severely punish data fraud to protect the wholeAgricultureA good environment for the development of the industry. Only true and accurate data can be usedAgricultureThe stable development of the industry provides strong support.