Red Sea Crisis: The "Red Sea Turmoil" in the Great International Chess Game
On the international stage, the Red Sea is becoming the center of a storm. In addition to the concerns raised by the Houthis in Yemen, countries such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Eritrea, Somalia and Djibouti also have the potential to influence the fate of the Red Sea. The turmoil in this region has a direct impact on the economic lifeline of the vast majority of countries in Asia and Europe, and the sentiment and stability of these countries have a direct bearing on the pocketbooks of the people of the countries of Asia and Europe.
Egypt's historical regrets and the strategic position of the Suez Canal.
Egypt has a long and tortuous history. Before 1952, Egypt was ruled by feudal dynasties, and the defeat of the Farouk dynasty on the Suez Canal issue made it impossible for Egypt to regain control from the British and French colonists. In 1952, the Egyptian people under the leadership of Nasser overthrew the Farouk dynasty and achieved a republic in the country. However, the Suez Canal remains the backbone of Egypt's economy, generating billions of dollars in revenue every year.
In this Red Sea crisis, Egypt's position is clearly anti-Houthi. This is not only because the Houthi blockade has blocked the Red Sea navigation and poses a direct threat to Egypt's economy, but also because Egypt wants to maintain its dominant position on the Suez Canal issue. The Suez Canal is the lifeblood of Egypt's economy, and Egypt will not easily relinquish control of it.
Saudi Arabia's regional leadership and economic considerations.
As a major country in the Middle East, Saudi Arabia is naturally the leading big brother of the Arab League. Saudi Arabia has a long coastline in the Red Sea, but its Red Sea coast is relatively safe relative to the reach of the Houthis in Yemen. However, as a regional leader, Saudi Arabia must maintain the stability of Red Sea navigation.
Saudi Arabia has complex economic relations in the Middle East, especially with the countries bordering the Red Sea. The United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait and other countries rely on the Red Sea to export oil, and Saudi Arabia, as the big brother in the region, naturally needs to intervene to maintain regional security at a critical moment to ensure its regional leadership.
Sudan's civil war plagues the fringe of Red Sea geopolitics.
Sudan has been suffering from civil war since independence. The constant civil war between the north and the south made the Sudan indifferent to the geopolitical situation in the Red Sea. The civil war has left Sudan** too busy dealing with internal problems and not much to deal with external threats in the Red Sea.
Eritrea's closed state and low-key diplomacy.
Eritrea is a closed country that has always kept a low profile in international affairs. In the Red Sea crisis, Eritrea did not take a stand in the Red Sea geopolitics due to its domestic political stability and relative economic independence. They close themselves off and don't have much to do with external forces, and this low-key keeps them from having much say in international affairs.
Djibouti's role as a small country with an international military base.
Djibouti, although a relatively small country, has attracted several countries to set up military bases on its territory due to its geopolitical peculiarities. This situation has made Djibouti also have a place in the Red Sea crisis and become an important stronghold of countries in the Red Sea region.
The interplay between the Somali piracy problem and the Red Sea crisis.
The escalation of the Red Sea crisis has created an opportunity for Somali pirates to get rich. Due to the obstruction of navigation in the Red Sea, merchant ships were diverted to the Cape of Good Hope, increasing the chances of Somali pirate attacks. This makes the Red Sea crisis not only a geopolitical issue, but also directly related to the safety of international maritime transport.
Summary: The deep impact of the Red Sea turmoil.
The Red Sea crisis is not confined to Yemen's Houthi rebels, but also involves Egypt's historical regrets, Saudi Arabia's regional leadership, Sudan's civil war, Eritrea's closed state, Djibouti's role as a small state, and the Somali piracy problem. The deep-seated impact of this turmoil is affecting the big international chess game and has a bearing on the economic interests of the people of Asian and European countries. How the geopolitical landscape of the Red Sea region evolves will not only determine the fate of these countries, but also directly affect the trend of the global economy. The Red Sea, like an outlet, not only challenges the wisdom of international politicians, but also tests the resilience of the global economic system. This turmoil is becoming a complex test for the international community.
Recent tensions in the Red Sea region have attracted international attention. In addition to Yemen's Houthi rebels, other countries along the Red Sea, such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Eritrea, Somalia and Djibouti, are also involved, creating a complex geopolitical picture.
Egypt: The historical and economic lifeblood of the Suez Canal.
Egypt's history is deeply connected to the Red Sea. After 1952, the Republic of Egypt was established, but the Suez Canal issue has always been a problem for Egypt. The canal is the lifeblood of Egypt's economy, generating huge revenues for it every year. As a result, Egypt is particularly concerned about the stability of the Red Sea, and the blockade could lead to economic losses.
Saudi Arabia: Regional leadership and maritime security.
As a major power in the Middle East, Saudi Arabia plays a leading role in the Arab League. The Red Sea is crucial for Saudi Arabia, especially with its long coastline. Saudi Arabia has an active responsibility to maintain the Red Sea navigation, as many of its neighbors rely on the Red Sea for maritime purposes**. Saudi Arabia's involvement is not only a manifestation of regional leadership, but also a function of maintaining the stability of sea lanes.
Sudan: Plagued by civil war and regional marginality.
Sudan has long been mired in civil war, which has led to its relative passivity on the Red Sea. The civil war has left Sudan** struggling to cope with its internal problems and unable to devote much energy to the external challenges of the Red Sea region.
Eritrea: A closed state and low-key diplomacy.
Eritrea is a relatively closed country that has been keeping a low profile in international affairs. Its relative political stability and economic independence allowed it to keep a low profile during the Red Sea crisis. This low-key attitude gives it a relatively limited say in international affairs.
Djibouti: The Role of a Small State and an International Military Base.
Although Djibouti is a small country, due to its geopolitical peculiarities, it has become a place where several countries have set up military bases in the Red Sea region. This has given Djibouti an influence on the Red Sea issue, allowing it to play a role in geopolitics.
The problem of Somali piracy: a collateral effect of the Red Sea crisis.
The escalation of the crisis in the Red Sea has created new opportunities for Somali pirates. The blockade of the Red Sea has led to the diversion of merchant ships, increasing the likelihood of Somali pirate attacks. This further exacerbates insecurity in the Red Sea region and makes the problem even more far-reaching.
Summary: The multidimensional impact of the Red Sea turmoil.
Far from being a simple conflict, the Red Sea crisis is a multi-layered, multidimensional problem. Countries have played different roles in this turmoil and have been affected differently. This crisis has a bearing on the big international chess game and has a direct bearing on the economic interests of the peoples of Asian and European countries. The geopolitical landscape of the Red Sea region is undergoing profound changes and has become the focus of the international community. How to find balance in this turmoil has become a test of the wisdom of all countries.