Macron knows how to make "big news", and one sentence is enough to shake the entire NATO. On February 26, 25 Western heads of state gathered in Paris for an international aid conference for Ukraine. After the meeting, Macron said something like this: "As far as the current situation is concerned, the West must use all means to prevent Russia from winning the war, therefore, no possibility can be ruled out, including the direct sending of troops by NATO member countries to Ukraine". 
I have to say that Macron's statement is indeed "imposing", which seems to have pushed the Russia-Ukraine conflict to a new height. It should be noted that he is no longer talking about aid to missiles and funds, but about directly sending troops and meeting Russia on the battlefield. Since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Russia has spoken out more than once, and its attitude could not be clearer, that is, NATO should not end up and not push a nuclear power into a corner, the consequences of which are unforeseeable. Once the West directly sends troops, it will undoubtedly be a declaration of war on Russia, starting a third world war, or even a nuclear war, is NATO really willing? Hearing Macron's statement, the Western world exploded in an instantAs the saying goes, "Dead friends don't die poor"., we can't afford to put ourselves on the line for Ukraine, Ukraine can die to the last, we don't want to. 
As a result, a number of NATO countries, including Germany, Italy, Britain, Slovakia, and the United States, came one after another, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said that "Germany will never send troops to prevent the escalation of the war", British Prime Minister Sunak said that "that is the business of the French themselves", and Slovak Prime Minister Fizo said that "as a member of NATO and the European Union, Slovakia has no such intention." Subsequently, Biden also hurriedly spoke to clarify that "the United States will not send troops, and the United States will never let NATO send troops", at the same time, France also exploded, and the leader of the far-right party "National ** Line" Le Pen accused Macron's proposal of being too crazy and ignoring the subversion of French security and European order. In this way, the entire Western world is opposed, so why is Macron still so "eye-opening"? 
Macron's operation is true or false, and it is indeed intriguing. First, on the issue of aiding Ukraine, France's enthusiasm has always been average, Looking at the data of Western aid to Ukraine, France, as a major European country, is far behind Germany and the United Kingdom in military aid to Ukraine, and even Denmark, Norway, Poland, the Netherlands, and Belgium can't catch up, and the armaments and funds are so small, let alone such a big thing as sending troops, so it is not ruled out that Macron is brushing up his sense of existence, taking this opportunity to publicize "European strategic autonomy" and show French leadership. Whether it is France or some Eastern European countries, no country really cares about Ukraine, but only hopes to contain and consume Russia through Ukraine. Sending troops is a verbal addiction, and how much can it cost to send troops verbally? If they really want to send troops, they may run faster than anyone else. Second, "sending troops" is also putting pressure on the United States, As the largest financial host of Ukraine, but due to political struggles, military aid has not been in place, Macron directly put "sending troops" on the table, directly put the United States as an army, if the United States aid is not in place, NATO brothers will really have to send people to the battlefield, and in the end something really happened, it is still the boss who is in charge! 
Thirdly, considering that Ukraine is losing ground and is retreating, the battlefield ** is by no means the death that Zelensky said 310,000, the situation on the battlefield is precarious, and the soldiers are already stretched. If it continues to fight as it has done in the past, Ukraine will not see any hope, even if it is only to lower the requirements to prevent Russia from winning, Ukraine does not have the ability to do so. And once Russia wins this conflict, it will be a disaster for NATO countries, not only the huge amount of aid they have provided to Ukraine in the past two years has been in vain, but it also proves that NATO's strategy towards Russia can be declared a complete failure. 
In this case, it is really necessary for NATO to think about how this war should continue next, and if it is determined to prevent Russia from winning on the battlefield, the option of sending troops directly cannot be ruled out. In fact, there will be no direct military troops to Ukraine, which has been discussed within NATO since the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflictMoreover, Western aid is already cutting sausages. Two years ago, NATO countries also said that "they will never provide tanks and planes", but slowly, Germany directly sent the Leopard 2 to Ukraine, and the United States even took out cluster bombs, long-range missiles, and F-16 fighters.