The Central China Agricultural University incident continues to ferment, involving Huang's crime or involving more people!
These days, there are all kinds of reports everywhere, and we are all used to it. However, the 11 students of Huazhong Agricultural University still touched many people and were deeply moved by them.
Time has indeed changed. In the past, we talked about "respecting teachers and respecting the way", just like honoring one's own parents. But now, this has been put into doubt.
Who is responsible for this?
Huazhong Agricultural University, located in Wuhan, Hubei Province, is a national "211 Project" university, integrating agriculture, engineering, literature, law, economics, management and other majors for coordinated development. The dean of such a prestigious university is suspected of academic misconduct and fraud, which unlucky person is this?
The school quickly reported Huang's academic problems to the school, but the matter did not end there.
In the event of a dispute, the best way for the authorities to announce the outcome of the dispute is to calm the public's discontent and minimize the impact. However, this is not necessarily the best course of action for victims.
The victims of the accident are not only 11 doctoral students, college students and graduates of Huazhong Agricultural University, but also many students who are about to graduate.
Although Huang Moumou was quickly sentenced to death, there were "no follow-ups" or "incomplete" situations after the verdict, which is also worth paying attention to.
In this case, there are at least three problems.
First and foremost, there is "academic deception".
11 master's students wrote more than 125 pages of reports, which were well-founded and accompanied by **, so that the university did not need to do anything on its own.
In this article, the fake numbers are clearly written, and it can be seen from the ** in the laboratory that these numbers are fake. After all, you can't expect one person's mind to do 11 experiments at the same time and distribute the results evenly among the 11 classmates.
By the way, he also remembered Mashu Mountain. As he wrote this letter, he listed countless incriminating evidence. Perhaps, he was arrested because he had too many clues, or that he simply did not have enough evidence.
If you want to have compassion for the informant, you must have a certain amount of courage and perseverance, and you must dare to collect clues. Without proper evidence, there is a high chance that you will be accused of being a defamator, which is very difficult to do.
Second, whether the criminal act suspected by Huang Moumou is suspected of misappropriation.
Judging from what the students said, there are several suspicious things. For example, the students finally found the "specimen materials" that Huang had requested, but when they bought them, the teacher said that they didn't have to worry about it.
Who will bear the materials needed for the test? How big is it? How much does it cost? There is no clear answer to this. What's even more interesting is that in the absence of experimentation, the data would have been produced as usual.
What kind of person Huang Moumou is, and it is really incomprehensible that he can have such strength.
In addition, some classmates reported that he not only deducted labor costs, but even had to reimburse equipment that did not exist in the laboratory. Even if you send someone over, I'm afraid it's extremely efficient, and you still need detective skills.
The third suspicious question is whether he has received funding from **.
As long as he gets a research project, he will get a grant from **, but he didn't do anything, just transplanted some old materials to his own research project, and then modified it slightly, just trying to make money by relying on fake research results?
So, how reliable are those sources? If this information is used as a reference for research and development, how much loss will there be?
The whistleblower said that the doctor taught by Huang said that as long as he went to the library to check the materials, check the relevant literature, and then forge a research report, he could cheat money. Doesn't that mean that many people can get research funding in this way?
A lot of ** are writing articles for themselves, and there are even many people who are experts in this area, why haven't they been funded by **? Is it fair to do so?
If the director of a national university has such a mentality and level of academic management, what kind of confidence will he have in applying for university in the future?
The victim of Huang's case is no longer limited to his classmates at school, but is related to the education of the whole of China and the respect of all children for learning. He overshadowed the cause of education for this great nation.
However, Huang Moumou is not the only hateful person.
Some classmates reported that Huang often watched videos in class. However, the students of the "211 Project" university are willing to pay a high fee not for "water classes", but for studying.
However, such a confusing teacher has won the "Outstanding Teacher Representative Award" and won many honors.
As for whether to slap or slap in the face, that's not the point, the point is, what is the basis for the evaluation of this university? Is it possible for every teacher to receive this award, or is it only for people in certain fields to receive this award?
This skill may include, but is not limited to, interacting with people. If so, how?
After so many years, the environment here has been extremely bad, and there are not even the most basic instruments, so doesn't the academy care about it?
Huang Moumou confessed to the consumables and equipment purchased, but the items were not found in the laboratory. So how did Huang Moumou have no fear, no fear? What does this mean?
If it is the school's fault, it is the school's fault, and all the blame cannot be put on Mr. Huang.
His academic fraud in front of the public is not enough, and the authorities should conduct a more in-depth examination of Huazhong Agricultural University.
What we are worried about is that once Huang Moumou is sentenced to death, the impact on society may not be great, but when the public sentiment gradually subsides, will more facts appear?