Recently, GuangdongXu WenIt happened together".MercedesThe man smashed the car" incident, which caused a wide range of peopleSocialConcerns and controversies. On January 29, a white car and a black commercial vehicle were thereXu WenThere was a dispute during the queue to buy tickets and get on the ship, and in the dispute, Wang, who was riding in a commercial car, actually got out of the car and smashed the hood of the white car, causing the hood to dent. In view of Wang's bad behavior,Xu WenThe county public security bureau carried out on himAdministrative detention10 days, and a fine of 500 yuan.
This incident has attracted widespread attention from netizens, especially because the party who was smashed was the daughter of Internet celebrity Grandma Xu. However, in the ** report on February 2, after verification, it was found that the driver was not Grandma Xu when the vehicle was smashed, but a man, and the specific identity was unclear. Subsequently, a new ** flowed out, showing that at the time of the incidentMercedesThe car did not have a plugged phenomenon when driving, but was squeezed by the white car of Grandma Xu's house, which made the incident take a new turn.
In an interview with reporters, Grandma Xu's daughter said that before the two cars entered the passage and lined upMercedesThe car has been behind the right side of his car, obviously trying to plug in. She believes that the announcement of the public security organs has clearly stated the truth and denies the reversal of the incident. Grandma Xu's daughter also said that their family had already been subjected to cyberbullying and did not want to discuss the matter again.
This series of events has sparked various voices and discussions among netizens. Some people questioned whether Grandma Xu's side deviated from the truth of the incident, believing that Grandma Xu's side was also at fault, but they were unwilling to admit it. There are also speculations about why Grandma Xu's daughter is reluctant to discuss this matter anymore, thinking that it may be because of a weak heart. Netizens had a heated debate on the matter.
In view of this incident, we need to analyze it rationally and objectively, not to believe the words of one side, but also to wait for the truth to be revealed. And at this time,SocialThere was a fierce debate about several suspicious points in this incident. Here are some of these points of contention:
1. Evidence that conforms to the facts.
In this incident, the ** of a dash cam became an important piece of evidence. According to this paragraph**,MercedesThe car did not stop when driving, but was squeezed by the white car of Grandma Xu's house. The disclosure of this ** has triggered netizens to rethink the truth of the matter. Some people believe that the evidence shows a reversal of events, but on the other hand, there are also people who wonder if this paragraph has been edited and edited to erase some parts that are unfavorable to Grandma Xu.
2. Grandma Xu's rhetorical explanation.
Grandma Xu's daughter said in an interview with **MercedesThe car had been behind the right side of his car before driving, and it was obvious that he wanted to plug it, so the main responsibility for the matter should be thereMercedesOn the car side, the announcement of the public security organs has proved this. This explanation sparked netizens' concernsMercedesThere is a question of whether the car side has the act of adding stops. Someone insistsMercedesOthers were skeptical of this claim, believing that Grandma Xu's family was at fault.
3. Grandma Xu's silence and refusal to discuss.
Although ** and netizens have widely reported and discussed the incident, Grandma Xu said that she was unwilling to discuss the matter anymore, and said that they had been subjected to cyberbullying. Regarding this reaction, some netizens expressed their understanding, thinking that Grandma Xu's side had enough of it and should not continue. Others were skeptical of Grandma Xu's refusal to discuss, feeling that Grandma Xu's silence might mean more untold truths.
As a bystander, I believe that in this case, we should not easily draw conclusions, let alone blindly follow the trend. In the Internet age, the dissemination of information is often full of subjective factors and personal positions, and the truth often needs to be precipitated over time and confirmed by evidence before it can be revealed to the world.
In this incident, the confrontation between the two sides and the controversy over the evidence made the whole incident full of various contradictions and uncertainties. We must look at the problem rationally and objectively, comprehensively consider the explanations and evidence of all parties, and wait for the final conclusion of the investigation.
At the same time, I also think that the discussion of this incident on social media should be more rational and respectful. The act of cyberbullying not only does not help solve the problem, but also makes it easier to push the problem to the extreme. We should believe that the investigation by the judicial organs and public security organs can restore the truth, rather than making judgments based on momentary enthusiasm and personal subjective speculation.
In the end, I hope that this incident can be supervised and supported by **Socialto get a just solution. I also hope that each of us will be able to pay attentionSocialQuestions, stick to the moral bottom line, and pass them on in cyberspacePositive energyto create a harmonious, rational and kind togetherSocialEnvironment.