Recently, there is a piece of news that has aroused heated discussions among the majority of netizens, that is, Shanghai Pudong has piloted the opportunity to allow foreign talents to serve as public institutions and state-owned enterprise legal persons. According to the interpretation of some experts, Shanghai is the forefront of national reformParticipating in the global competition in the new economy requires high-end talents。I don't know what people think of such things, but as a Chinese, I always maintain a high degree of vigilance against such things. Let me give you an example, in order to speed up the development of domestic chips, we have invested heavily in the introduction of foreign talents to serve as core research positions in domestic scientific research institutions, and soon we have manufactured chips. But once there is a conflict of interest in some countries, will these foreigners continue to serve our country, or will they just walk away, or even engage in sabotage? For this reason, I have the following worries and share them for your reference.
As for employing people, I personally adhere to the concept of appointing people on the basis of merit. However, there is a premise for this, that is, they must be Chinese, whether they are public institutions or state-owned enterprises, and the decision-making power and development direction of China's affairs can only be in their own hands, and must not be in the hands of foreigners. If we say that we recruit talented people from the international community and make contributions to the development and construction of the motherland, this is understandable, and it is also a way to learn from each other and exchange with each other. However, if the decision-making power of some units in our system were to be handed over to foreigners, the nature would be completely different. I don't know why, when I saw the news, my first impression was that I thought of the story of Wu Sangui leading the Qing soldiers into the customs at the end of the Ming Dynasty. It may also be that I am overly cautious, but despite this, we support some reform measures that are beneficial to the country, but on this kind of issue involving foreigners in managing China's affairs, especially core affairs, we cannot easily draw conclusions, and we must be cautious.
Of course, our principle of employing people has long been "both ability and political integrity, morality first". But in any case, our original intention is to ensure the stability of the society, on the basis of ensuring the healthy development of the society on the basis of more efficient use of talents. Historically, there have been foreigners who have served in our country's institutions, but the situation at that time was different from now, when international competition was not fierce, and these foreigners were gradually assimilated after holding positions in our country's system. In today's language, it means that you have joined the nationality of our country and become a Chinese with a foreign appearance, if it is the use of high-end scientific and technological talents, of course, there is not much problem. But for managerial talents, there is no high-tech in itself, is it possible that China's more than one billion people, even such a few people can not be picked out? Definitely not, in fact, in this matter itself, in my personal opinion, they want to achieve the goal of changing their concepts in this way, that is, to use Western business philosophy to manage public institutions and state-owned enterprises, is this the rhythm of "total Westernization"?
As we all know, China is completely different from some Western countries in terms of its basic national conditions, cultural traditions, and development concepts. In other words, if you want to manage China's affairs well, you must use some talents who have a special understanding of China's national conditions, are particularly proficient in Chinese culture, and have a very deep understanding of China's development philosophy. That is to say, these foreign talents who are finally determined may not be foreigners of pure blood, but some children who have renounced their Chinese nationality or some children who were born abroad in Chinese, and only these people may meet the above conditions. If this is the case, then the question is even greater, is the introduction of this policy a position tailored for certain groups or certain groups? Just like a targeted selection of international students in some places last year, is it a policy specially tailored for some groups? Of course, this is just my personal speculation, and we will have to see the specific plans and actions in the next step to know.
It can be said that the promulgation of such a policy has a huge impact on China, especially on China's traditional concepts. We have always been proud that we are Chinese, and after the founding of New China in 1949, the party and state leaders firmly expressed the idea that to adhere to independence and self-determination, China's affairs must be handled by the Chinese themselves. And is the release of this policy contrary to the concept of independence? It may seem that the entry of a very small number of expatriates into the management of China affairs has little impact, but what will be the trend in the long run? Now it is a public institution and a state-owned enterprise, will there be judicial organs and administrative units in the future? After all, the water drops wear through the stones, and the bones are destroyed! It can be said that the events in Hong Kong a few years ago have shown that there is a huge impact, and the country is trying to eliminate some foreign forces, but now Shanghai is doing the opposite, actively bringing foreigners into the management of Chinese affairs, and I really don't understand this kind of operation.
It is true that if some foreign talents who love China come to work in China and join Chinese enterprises, of course, we are very welcome. If they have made great contributions to the development of the country and successfully become the nationality of our country, it means that these people love our country from the bottom of their hearts, and it is of course natural for these foreigners who have become our nationality to hold some suitable leadership positions. We all know that every country requires unconditional allegiance to one's homeland at the beginning of naturalization, and this kind of thing is not allowed to be joked. Let's imagine what would happen if a foreigner was allowed to participate in the management of domestic affairs when there was a conflict with his national interests. If this person gives up the interests of his motherland to help China without changing his nationality, it means that this person is not loyal enough, at least in terms of morality. So does such a talent meet the standard of both ability and political integrity?
Generally speaking, upholding independence and self-determination and insisting that the Chinese people themselves make decisions in China's affairs is a general direction that must not be shaken. It can be said that the party's basic line is the guiding marker of China's economic and social development, guiding us not to follow the old road of sticking to the old ways, nor to take the evil road of rushing for quick success and quick gain, but to take the right road of enlightenment and righteousness, and to take the road of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The road of socialism with Chinese characteristics is not only successful, but also fast and well, and it is a road to strengthening the country, enriching the people, and a road of hope for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. As the old saying goes, poverty is not socialism, and we agree with it. But I also want to say that prosperity is not necessarily socialism, it depends on whether its core adheres to the principle of independence and self-determination, whether it adheres to the first-class ideology, whether it adheres to the road of socialism with Chinese characteristics, whether it insists on seeking happiness for all the people of the country, and whether it insists on seeking rejuvenation for the Chinese nation. If you lose that, it's an evil path.
**10,000 Fans Incentive Plan