Do the villagers' representatives truly represent the wishes of the villagers? Or is it just a formality?
Several issues in the general election of village committees.
However, in some areas, there is a phenomenon of "going through the motions", that is, "going through the procedure", "going through the procedure", "going through the procedure", and so on. The low level of peasant participation makes elections a formality that does not truly reflect the will of the peasants. The reason for this may be related to the fact that the campaign propaganda work has not been done enough, and many people are not aware of the importance of the campaign. Second, because the election process is not formal enough, there are cases of interference and manipulation. Some criminals commit fraud in order to obtain votes for themselves or the candidates they support. The results of such elections clearly do not truly reflect the wishes of the villagers.
In order to effectively resolve this contradiction, it is first necessary to intensify political education among rural residents and enhance their sense of participation. Improve the transparency of the election process, ensure that every villager has a full voice, and make the results of the voting more credible.
Problems existing in the building of the contingent of rural grassroots cadres.
In order to give full play to its due role, it is necessary to have corresponding qualities and abilities. However, in actual work, the quality and ability of some village cadres are not high enough. The villagers are not rich enough in the relevant laws and legal knowledge of the village, and they are not able to deal with village-level affairs, so they cannot participate in the villagers' self-governance well.
In order to solve this problem, it is necessary to pay attention to the cultivation and improvement of village-level organizations. Through various forms of training, lectures and other forms, so that they have a strong business quality. On this basis, through the guidance and training of the members of the village committee, they can play a better role and serve the villagers.
The rural grassroots governance and evaluation mechanism is not perfect.
The appointment and evaluation of members of villagers' committees play a crucial role in ensuring the smooth conduct of the election of villagers' committees. However, in many areas, there have been problems in supervising and evaluating the members of villagers' committees. Some villagers' committees lack specific systems and norms when appointing and evaluating villagers' committee members, with the result that the misconduct of villagers' committee members is connived at or connived at. Under such circumstances, it is difficult for villagers to effectively exercise their rights, and some of them will even violate the law.
Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the governance and supervision of the rural collective economy. It is necessary to formulate a perfect system for the appointment and evaluation of villagers, and formulate corresponding systems and norms. In the course of this process, it is necessary to strengthen supervision and control over the activities of members of villagers' committees, and if violations of law and discipline are discovered, they must be seriously investigated and dealt with.
On the connotation and value of the responsibility system of the director of the village committee.
Although it has certain flaws and flaws, its importance and value are undeniable. In practice, most of the villagers' representatives are able to fulfill their obligations well and serve the interests of the masses to a certain extent. In China, the peasant congress is the largest form of political organization in China, and it is also a major issue in the development of China's rural economy. It plays an important role in rural grassroots governance.
In order to make full use of the status of villagers' deputies in the rural areas, it is necessary to further strengthen democracy at the grassroots level in the rural areas and improve the corresponding systems and mechanisms. First of all, it is necessary to further improve China's electoral system and ensure that it is open, fair, and open. Second, it is necessary to strengthen the cultivation and cultivation of members of village-level organizations in order to enhance their overall quality and ability. Third, it is necessary to strengthen the management and supervision of grassroots political power and ensure the normal operation of grassroots political power. Fourth, it is necessary to intensify propaganda on the election of villagers' committees and enhance the masses' understanding of the election of villagers' committees.
On this basis, the participation of village-level organizations, villagers and other parties can promote the development and improvement of grassroots democratic politics in China.
Abstract:In China, village committees are a special form of organization in village-level organizations. However, in the process of practice, there are also some situations that cannot fully reflect the wishes of the villagers. This is embodied in the problems in the form of elections, the quality of deputies, and the management and evaluation of rural grassroots organizations. However, we cannot deny the status and role of the villagers' representative system in rural construction. By strengthening the building of democratic politics at the grassroots level, improving the corresponding systems and mechanisms, and improving the quality and ability of villagers' representatives, the functions of villagers' representatives can be brought into full play, so as to promote the harmony and development of the big family in the villages.