Here's the thing, there was an elderly person in the family who was sick, and the family quickly called 120 first aid**, hoping to send the old man to the hospital.
However, when the emergency personnel arrived at the scene, they insisted that the family members carry the elderly into the car by themselves, which made the family very incomprehensible, thinking that the medical staff had helped lift the 120 to the car before, why did they have to carry it themselves this time?
One of the medical staff explained that he had a lumbar spine disease and that it would be painful to stand for a long time, so he was not obliged to lift.
The family was very dissatisfied with this, because she was completely incapable of completing this task alone, and needed the help of two first responders.
I saw a news item on the Internet, titled "120 people came to the door and were reluctant to carry patients, saying that there was no obligation", and I was very surprised after reading it, this is really a unique human society in China.
This is a big surprise, because it is really hard to understand the first time I heard that an ambulance does not carry a patient.
The doctor and ** refused to carry the patient, which sparked heated discussions among netizens.
They stated that it was not their responsibility and that long-term work stress and physical condition also needed to be considered.
But is this in line with the duties of the doctor and the **?
Some people believe that doctors are essentially skilled angels in white, rational and calm professionals who have the right to decide how to assist in the handling of patients. But such a view has sparked more doubts and controversy.
A woman met a doctor at the hospital and refused to help carry the patient, saying that they had not fulfilled their due responsibilities.
The two staff members explained that hospital policy stipulates that doctors do not need to help carry patients, and that long-term fatigue may affect the health of medical staff.
Therefore, the crux of this issue lies in how to balance the work rights and interests of doctors and ** with the responsibility of emergency care for patients.
It's not just a legal and ethical issue, it's a practical need to find a suitable solution.
It was quite a big deal, but later the hospital and the patient's family reached a settlement.
The hospital apologized, and the staff involved were suspended. The patient's family also understood, deleted the relevant **, and the hospital also said that it would conduct further investigation and treatment of the medical staff.
The woman was confused by the experience of calling 120 for emergency services, as this was the case this time when paramedics used to help lift patients into ambulances.
Aren't the rules of the hospital different? But in the end, the lady accepted the doctors' decision because they had other, more urgent work to do. The condition of the old man has improved, and he has been diagnosed and treated by doctors.
Similar situations have been encountered in other hospitals, some with specialized porters, but there are also some places where there is no such service.
Some people believe that it is normal for doctors to refuse to help carry patients, and that it is not their obligation;Others see it as a gesture and the doctors' refusal to lend a helping hand is chilling.
This matter was originally a trivial matter, but it turned out to be quite complicated.
Not only does the hospital's reputation suffer, but it can also put the work of medical staff at risk. It is estimated that the two paramedics involved were so sorry that their bowels were blue.
The primary duties of a first responder are to save people, including providing medical treatment at the scene and transporting patients to hospitals.
According to the rules, they are not actually obligated to carry people into the ambulance.
Although there is a general belief that first responders should help patients get into their vehicles, the regulations do not actually require this.
This incident reminds us that we should pay more attention to humanized services, promote the change of perception and behavior of the entire emergency industry, and let more people feel warm and cared for in emergencies.
This is how we can truly put lives first and ensure that every first aid saves lives, not just technical actions.
In some emergencies, the first aid provider is on a stretcher and asks for an additional charge when the patient needs to carry someone in the emergency room.
Is this situation reasonable?Shouldn't the ambulance be responsible for this part?
Some people believe that ambulances have an obligation to help lift a patient and should not be charged extra.
Some hospitals may have a better service attitude due to the small number of patients;However, some large hospitals may think that the ambulance itself is operating at a loss, so the service requirements are stricter.
In addition, some emergency doctors said that they have to run 80 homes a day, so can they get to the scene in time in such a situation?
The key is a matter of thought, why not lift it up for a person who is physically able?
If the patient is your relative, you would want them to be rescued in time, right?
In some cases, families even waited for more than an hour, which delayed the rescue time, but the hospital used various reasons to shirk responsibility.
This practice makes people feel helpless, and there are no other healthy doctors in the hospital who can lend a hand?
Netizens have shared their experiences with the ambulance service.
A netizen mentioned an emergency at home and called 120 first aid**, but the other party told them that there was no service to lift people, but fortunately, there were many family members, and several sisters carried the patient by themselves.
Another netizen shared the experience of his grandfather, who had mild cerebral thrombosis symptoms.
After the first seizure, the other doctor directly carried the grandfather away, and then asked him to follow him to pay the bill. These experiences have sparked a discussion about the ambulance carrying service.
Many people have questioned the function of the 120 ambulance, believing that carrying people should be one of the duties of the ambulance.
Especially for some emergency patients who are not accompanied by family members, why not provide the service of lifting people when the condition requires it?
Under normal circumstances, the 120 operator will ask about the patient's condition and allocate the corresponding manpower according to the condition, but some people believe that since the fee is charged, the doctor should also help carry the patient, after all, they are more professional.
In response to this problem, it has been suggested that this is the best case if the family is willing to help lift the patient.
In addition, if you really need help lifting, you can explain it in advance to avoid unnecessary misunderstandings and troubles. These experiences and discussions have led to new thinking about the services and functions of ambulances.
The society has different attitudes towards the refusal of medical staff to carry away patients, and some people have called for strengthening the construction of the medical assistance system to protect the health rights and interests of the public.
This incident also reminds us that there are still some loopholes and problems in the medical assistance system, which need to be continuously improved and perfected.