NBA rules are constantly innovating, and the current All-Star voting has been changed to 50% fan votes, and 25% of players and ** votes each, so which part is more reliable?
Personally, I think that the fan part is more reliable, because the base is large enough, and the hundreds of millions of fans vote, and the possibility of bias is very small. It's like flipping a coin, you may have heads or tails 10 times in a row, but as long as you flip enough times, you'll find that the probability of heads and tails is infinitely close to 50%.
The part of the player and ** is easy to have tendencies, in contrast, the player voting is more reliable, because the player and the player are the most direct confrontation for a long time, who is the most difficult to deal with the most clear in the heart, but there is a characteristic of one thing falling one thing between the players, and some are the style of the ball, so there will be a certain error. As for the best players, whether it is the team's record or the development of players, there are very few times when they prefer to be popular with whom, and who is too angry to step on it immediately. So, I think the voting part can be canceled.