Zhuge Liang: Sit down, please listen to me. Troll: Ann you x. Bar Spirit:You say meDo you want to listen? Keyboard Warrior: Hehe, it's really a gasp in the face, it's really a spicy chicken.
Zhuge Liang: Cao Cao claims to be one million, but in fact it is only two or three hundred thousand. Troll: No, you're x. Gongjing: Which eye did you see 300,000,000Have you counted? Keyboard Warrior: Do you mean 300,000 is a lot? It's strange, what qualifications do you have as a villager to say that other people's Cao Cao is "but"?
Zhuge Liang: The fire of Bowang and the water of the White River, Guan Zhong and Le Yi's use of troops is nothing more than that. Troll: Use your x. Bar Spirit:So you feel like you're better than them? Keyboard Warrior: Please, after playing Xiahoudun, he called himself Guan and Le, and I still Han Xin, can you believe that you can beat Le Yi?
Zhuge Liang: The princes are good at saying great things, but there is no real strategy in their hearts, and they are really villains. Troll: Little you x. Gongjing: I'm just 1 villain, what's wrong? Keyboard Warrior: What a little Confucian, a gentleman and a villain, that's the pie drawn for you, who cares,Don't take yourself so seriously, please.
Zhuge Liang: I thought that there were many scholars in Jiangdong who must have high opinions, but when I saw it today, I was so rapped. Troll: Spare you. Bar Spirit:Rap? I'm still Jay Chou.
Keyboard Man: ThatLet's just say you know too littleWhat about Wolong, this is in a hurry? It's a sign of immaturity. Go back and read more books. Hehe, have all the celebrities and celebrities now fallen to this level? If it was me, I called the trolls to tears. Troll: Stream you x. Keyboard Man: ......
As mentioned above, even if he debates in the way of Confucianism in Romance, and is besieged by modern "trolls, bar spirits and keyboard warriors", Zhuge Liang will not be able to win. Because even if they lose money, they have to find a reason to roll in placeThere are no bottom lines, shame and restrictions at all.
And the Jiangdong Confucians in the romance are celebrities, yesSun Quan's 1 "limit" is here. If someone really doesn't want the bottom line, doesn't want to lose face, and goes to the bar regardless of the restrictions, he will not only lose his own face, but also lose Sun Quan's face. I'm afraid I won't be able to see people when I go out.
Unbelief? What would happen if the Internet implemented a real-name system now? Or in a formal business negotiation, do you represent Company A against Company B? I guess the boss will fire you the next day. What's more, there are names and surnames in the history books, such as Zhang Zhao, Yu Translation, and Cheng Deshu. Lu Ji or 24 filial piety, when the wind review does not exist?
Another example: Lu Ji said that Liu Bei is of Miao descent. was ridiculed by Zhuge Liang: This child's language is not enough to speak with Coats. Xue Zong said that the Han family was no longer orthodox, and was also angrily reprimanded by Zhuge Liang: Please do not reply- It is equivalent to directly blocking it. Why did Zhuge Liang dare to blackout and not be afraid of refutation?
Because Zhuge Liang also understands:Debate with limits is to be gained. To debate without limits is to be foolish. In the presence of Sun Quan (or conveyed), the debate between the Sun and Liu families over the issue of substantive interests (to resist Cao or surrender to Cao) is similar to today's high-end business negotiations.
Lu Ji pulled the bloodline, and Xue Zonghei's three views were already inferior and off topic. IfZhuge Liang has already pointed it outAnd keep rolling. is to change the topic and confuse Sun Quan's audio-visual. Still want to mix? Do you want to live?
In turn,Zhuge Liang is not unable to be a bar spirit, but he does not want to be pulled to a very low lower limit by them. Because he came to Soochow to show his value, but there are also restrictions. If you show yourself to be a "troll". Sun Quan will definitely look down on him, will he still form an alliance with Liu Bei?
Therefore, in the debate world, "trolls, bar spirits, and keyboard warriors" are indeed invincible. ButOnce in real life, there must be limitationsTheir logic is useless, worthless, and infallible.
There are limits to meaningful debate. All those who eat by debate in public do so in the interests of limits. The Confucians surrounded Zhuge Liang in order to show his eloquence in front of Sun Quan, and whoever was eloquent would be reused and raise his salary.
The passionate eloquence of the students in the college debate competitionRatings are their "limits".Whoever makes more sense will win the first place, or get the bonus.
During the Spring and Autumn Period, hundreds of schools of thought contended, openly swinging, and kicking the hall. The populace is their "limit"., who said that there are more students who make sense, and there is cash flow. In addition, the more disciples who are fast-talking, the more they can expand the influence of their own family, and maybe they can also be treated by the king with courtesy and be done by a prime minister.
Even on the Internet today, celebrities and celebrities are attacking each other, and others are selling courses. The people who eat melons like this, and after arguing for a long time, the heat has gone up, and the income has also come, fame and fortune. The people who eat melons are the restrictions of the bigwigs.
In a word, all those who argue in the open environment are profitable. As the saying goes, "no profit is not early". Debate with limits is profitable. And what has no limit is a complete waste of life.
Piggyback, Mingyue was first updated at the end of the world. However, due to the connivance of the administrators, the article is full of inexplicable humiliation and abuse from the trolls. As a result, Mingyue left angrily. Lost the limits of the construction ** stream and debate, in the end, who suffers, it is self-explanatory.
Think about life againIs it just to argue to more than 3 rounds,Can it be summed up as a "meaningless dialogue" with no setting, no interests, and no ceiling? Then I ask you what else you have to argue?
Some people say that I and my colleagues are in front of the leader, and in the end I win the colleague's bar, and the leader adopts my plan, and I am reusedIs that a limit?
In fact, as long as you think about it calmlyDoes it need to be refuted face-to-face to enlist the support of the leadership? Why don't you report to the leader separately afterwards? In this case, the leader is a neutral party, who has the best plan to level the leader, can he waste his own saliva?
Almost all people who love to compete have one characteristic:I always want to tell everyone that I'm right. In fact, the gains outweigh the losses, because it not only brings you negative emotions, but also consumes your energy, and teaches others. As a result, it was also said that he was pretentious and unreasonable.
In the end, you helped people pay the tuition for their energy, and you sulkedYou also teach others to be smart, and people don't obey youAre you trying to bring shame on yourself?
Therefore, whether it is online or in life, whenever you meet a "troll, bar spirit or keyboard warrior", you will lose if you open your mouth to say a word. I'll meet this next timeA direct sentence "How much is the tuition?" ”Isn't it stupid to give your hard-earned ideas to people who pass the time with the logic of survival?
What will happen if Zhuge Liang really meets "bar spirits, trolls, and keyboard warriors"? "The Biography of Zhuge Liang in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is written very clearly"Shu Branch": Although those who skillfully order reeds will be killed- Specializes in dealing with similar creatures. People don't waste their lives on meaningless things. Do you touch Xu Chu's hair?
Such as the Three KingdomsXu You, Yang Xiu, Kong Rong and the likeTroll, a really powerful person who will say 1 more word to you. Modern people rely on the law to follow, and life is too salty.