Fuzhou, Fujian, residents want to go back to their homes at 12 o'clock in the evening, but they are asked by the doorman to pay 10 yuan "door opening fee", the residents are not satisfied with the reporter **, but the doorman uncle said wildly: It is my right to charge 10 yuan to open the door, you can complain if you are not convinced, someone has already complained to me, I am still the doorman of the ** bureau! Why would a doorman be so arrogant? Who gave him the confidence?
Case **: The First Gang).
Ms. Lin, a resident of the community, said that as long as it is more than 12 o'clock in the evening, the uncle will start to charge, whether it is entering or going out, and the fee is 10 yuan each time, and the door will not be opened if you don't pay the money.
And the uncle also has a set of his own set of charging standards, parking fees also have to charge 10 yuan, in this way, the community is mainly to drive in and out at night, at least 30 yuan to pay, which makes the owners of the community very helpless.
Obviously it is her own home, but she has to charge the door opening fee when she goes home, which is really infuriating, once Ms. Lin is really angry, so she called the police, thinking that after the police arrived, the uncle would realize that his behavior was inappropriate, and he would stop charging the door opening fee.
However, the uncle not only did not cancel the door opening fee, but intensified it, Ms. Li was angry about this, she just went home, how could it be so difficult? If you don't pay this money, you will shout that the sky is broken, and the doorman will not pay attention to you.
Ms. Lin's friend said that she began to pay the uncle on the 21st of last month, and paid 17 times in less than one month, totaling 170 yuan.
The reporter immediately visited and investigated the matter, and it was early in the morning, and the investigator followed a property owner into the community, and after he walked around the community, he was ready to leave the place in about 15 minutes.
When he went out, the doorman hurriedly greeted him and asked him to pay 10 yuan for opening the door, if you don't pay this money, don't come to this community again in the future, even if you shout and break your throat, I won't open the door for you, you weigh it yourself.
When the investigator asked the doorman why he charged, the uncle said that this was the labor fee he deserved, "Because you disturbed my sleep, I was already asleep after 12 o'clock, and you should pay if you tell me to get up and open the door!" ”
looks so bold and fearless, a security guard who is supposed to maintain order, but openly collects money from the owner, is there really no one who can control it?
Ms. Lin said that they had also called the police to complain before, but the police only played a mediating role after the door, and then the doorman did not restrain himself, but was more fearless, unscrupulous about the charge, as long as he did not pay the money, he would not open the door for you.
In order to solve the problem for the residents, the investigators came to the community service center, but the staff said that the doorman fee is a matter of the property in the community, and they must respect the internal management of the community, although they know that it is not right to collect money, but this kind of thing is a personal behavior, and they have nothing to do.
Ms. Lin told the investigator that once a friend came to the house as a guest, but the doorman refused to open the door in the early morning to let the friend leave, and she also called the police at that time, but the police could not do anything after they arrived, and finally the friend was forced to climb over the wall to leave the community.
Ms. Lin's other roommate had to pay the doorman more than 200 yuan a month for opening the door because she got off work late, and later the doorman gave her a discount and directly changed it to 60 yuan per month.
For the situation of private fees for the doorman, the property company has long known that it has been in a laissez-faire state, the reason is that the salary they give to the doorman is very low, and it is understandable that they rely on this to increase their income.
The property staff said, "Our community is a dormitory, and the door is closed between 11 and 12 o'clock at night, and the doorman is a sleeping shift system, if he wants to open the door after 12 o'clock at night, it is equivalent to his additional labor."
Hearing this, the investigator was also quite speechless, is there no justice in this matter? When the reporter came to the property company for the second time, the receptionist became the manager of the property company, and his attitude changed 180 degrees.
The manager of the property company said that after the incident, the company sent Manager Zheng to find the party as soon as possible, "Your ** let us find the problem, we really don't know, this point is relatively small."
Manager Zheng said that if there are owners in and out or tenants in and out, the doorman must open the door in time, and it is his job duty to open the door, and there is no reason to come back at night to open the door and charge. Whether the property knows anything about it or not, only they know the inside story.
The author wants to say that the doorman's approach is really shocking, it is within the scope of his duties, but it seems that everyone owes him, maybe there is no doorman, maybe the owners are more comfortable.
Article 987 of the Civil Code stipulates that if the gainer knows or should know that the benefits obtained have no legal basis, the person who suffers the loss may request the gainer to return the benefits he has obtained and compensate for the losses in accordance with the law.
The owners have the right to ask the uncle to return the relevant fees collected, and the impact of the uncle's misconduct is very poor, and the property management company can consider dealing with it accordingly, rather than just talking.
What do you think about this? Knowledge Creation Challenge