The most important part of the bidding evaluation process is what you should keep in mind
Bid evaluation is the most complex and critical part of the bidding process, because this process directly determines who wins the bid.
1. Bid Evaluation Committee.
The bid evaluation work is the responsibility of the bid evaluation committee - professional matters are handed over to professional people. However, the bid evaluation committee is set up by the tenderer in accordance with the law, and it is not a random search for a few people to be considered a bid evaluation committee.
First of all, how to say that engineering construction is also a technical work, so the members of the committee in the technical, economic experts to account for more than 2 3, the bid evaluation committee by the tenderer representatives and experts, the total number must be more than 5 people, and must be singular, so that when you need to vote, you can draw a conclusion.
Secondly, the experts of the bid evaluation committee are not who you are familiar with and who you will find, and must be selected from the expert database provided by the relevant departments of the state, province and city (the experts in the expert database also have a threshold, and the general requirement is that they have worked in the relevant field for more than 8 years and have a senior professional title or equivalent professional level).
Again, choosing experts in the expert pool is not like buying cabbage in the vegetable market, it is generally randomly selected, but there are special circumstances. That is, if the project is highly professional, complex or the state has clear requirements, and the randomly selected experts are not enough to ensure the smooth progress of the bid evaluation work, the members of the bid evaluation committee can be directly determined by the tenderer.
Finally, the members of the bid evaluation committee must not have a potential interest in the bidder, and the list of members of the bid evaluation committee must be kept confidential until the winning result is determined, which we have also mentioned many times in the previous article.
Second, bid evaluation. The bid evaluation is divided into two stages: preliminary evaluation and detailed evaluation.
1) Preliminary review.
First of all, the bid evaluation committee compares and evaluates the bidding documents in accordance with certain standards and methods, which must be clearly stated in the bidding documents, and there is no such thing as the bidding documents, which cannot be used as the basis for bid evaluationThis last sentence is placed here in a light and unremarkable way, believe me if I don't say it, and you won't care too much. But in actual work, whether it is a low-price bid or a comprehensive score - we will talk later, when there is a disagreement around the winning bid or the ** score is the same, how to choose one of the two at this time, as a bidder, you must understand that if the bid evaluation committee's statement is unfavorable to you, and it is not in the bidding documents, you can argue. From the other side, we should understand that it is also necessary to read and read the bidding documents.
Secondly, in the process of bid evaluation, experts feel that there are problems in the bidding documents, such as inconsistent expressions, unclear explanations of a certain matter, obvious errors, etc., the bidder can be required to explain and supplement (written notice), and the bidder should also respond in writing, but the content of the explanation can not break through the substantive content of the bidding documents.
In this link, you may have found that there is a loophole. Therefore, the bidder cannot take the initiative to make supplementary explanations, and must have the opportunity to explain after the bid evaluation committee raises questions; On the other hand, the experts of the bid evaluation committee cannot imply that the bidder will make an explanation.
Again, there are several criteria that must be clear during the bid evaluation process:One isIf the amount indicated by words and numbers is inconsistent, the text shall prevail; The second isWhen the total bid price is different from the total price calculated by the unit price and the quantity of work, the unit price shall prevail, if the unit has obvious errors, if there is one less digit, the decimal point is wrong, etc., the total price shall prevail at this time. The above adjustment is finally to be notified to the bidder and confirmed by the bidder before it has legal effect.
Finally, during the bid evaluation process, it is found that the following situations cannot continue to participate in the bidding. First, the person in charge of the voting unit did not sign and did not affix the official seal of the unit; Second, the bidder did not pass the qualification examination; Third, the bidder submitted different bidding documents and **, of course, if the bidding documents allow it, it should be different; Fourth, the bidding documents did not respond to the substantive requirements in the bidding documents; Fifth, the bidder has fraudulent behavior; Sixth, the bid ** is lower than the cost price or higher than the bid price (note: it is not said that it cannot be lower than the minimum bid limit); Seventh, the bidding consortium joint bidding agreement was not submitted.
2) Detailed review.
In the detailed evaluation process, it is necessary to further compare and evaluate the technical and commercial parts, and the most commonly used evaluation methods are the low-price winning method and the comprehensive evaluation method.
1.Evaluated low-price winning method.
First of all, pay attention to the words "reviewed", indicating that the low-price bidding method is not blindly who can win the bid if it is low, but to review the rationality and feasibility of the plan, and at the same time, it cannot be lower than the project cost.
Secondly, this method is generally used for projects with relatively mature technology and no special requirements for performance standards.
Again, the bid evaluation committee according to the standards and methods specified in the bidding documents, the bidding and commercial parts of the necessary adjustments, but not the technical part of the conversion.
Finally, through the review, the bid evaluation committee draws up a "bid price comparison table", which needs to clarify the bidding, the adjustment and description of the commercial part, and the final evaluation.
2.Comprehensive assessment method.
When the project is complex in terms of technical performance or has special requirements, and is not suitable for the low-price bidding method, the comprehensive evaluation method is adopted.
During the evaluation process, a comprehensive comparison is generally made through currency conversion or scoring methods, and the winning candidate is finally selected. According to the standard method specified in the bidding documents, the bid evaluation committee shall carry out weighted calculation and quantitative comparison of the bidding method and **, and the standard basis must be unified, so that it can be comparable in the end.
Finally, the bid evaluation committee will also issue a table - "comprehensive evaluation comparison table", which contains the bidding**, business adjustment, technical adjustment, evaluation of each evaluation element, and the final evaluation results of each bid.
Another point, sometimes the bidder will put forward a better technical scheme than the technical scheme required by the bidding documents, performance, efficiency, economic output are better, unless the bidding documents can clearly submit or consider alternatives, otherwise before the winning bidder is clarified, the evaluation process is not considered, after winning the bid can be adopted.
c) Need attention.
1.In the process of bid evaluation, if the experts of 1 3 believe that the evaluation time is not enough, it can be extended.
2.In the process of bid evaluation, it is found that a bidder is significantly lower than other homes or the bottom of the bid, which may lead to its ** may be lower than the cost, it should be required to explain in writing and provide corresponding materials, if it cannot be provided, the bid evaluation committee can reject its continued bidding.
3.In the process of bid evaluation, if there are less than 3 bidders due to the rejection of the bid, all the bids can be rejected.
4.To extend the validity period of bid evaluation, the tenderer shall notify all bidders in writing, and if the bidder agrees, the deposit time shall also be extended; If the bidder does not agree, the bidder has the right to withdraw the deposit, but the bid will automatically become invalid; If the loss is caused to the bidder due to the extension of time, the tenderer shall compensate.
4) Bid evaluation report.
After the completion of the bid evaluation work, the bid evaluation committee shall submit a written bid evaluation report, and also need to copy the relevant ** department for the record.
The bid evaluation committee recommends no more than 3 winning bidders, and these 3 are in order. That is to say, the tenderer can only determine the winning bidder according to the list of winning bidders, and can not choose, it is determined according to the order, unless there is a problem with the first ranking, then choose the second ......
All members of the bid evaluation committee shall sign the bid evaluation report, and if there are different opinions, they can explain in writing; If there is a difference of opinion and no written explanation or signature, it is deemed to agree with the bid evaluation results.
Finally, let's talk a little bit about calibration.
After the bid evaluation committee submits the bid evaluation report, the tenderee shall publicize the winning candidate within 3 days, and the publicity time shall be at least 3 days, if there is any objection to the publicity results, the tenderee shall reply within 3 days after receiving the objection.
The tenderer shall determine the winning bidder within the validity period of the bid, of course, it can also authorize the bid evaluation committee to determine the winning bidder, and generally will not delegate this power.
Article recommendation
What should be paid attention to when signing a contract for a project project.
The tender is not good for me, can I apply for a re-tender.
Is the construction change procedure of the project only proposed by the employer?
What are the circumstances in which a bid must be rejected.
Beware of losses: Is the deposit in the bidding must be returned, and what are the circumstances that are not refundable Kunpeng plan