People who are new to Kumon writing will make many mistakes, and here is a summary of the five major misunderstandings based on personal experience, hoping to provide you with a reference and avoid detours. Friends who like it can follow and collect this article, and after following me, privately send me the four words "Complete Speeches", and you can receive a collection of 100 classic speeches.
1. Mistakenly believe that the longer the article, the better.
Some people write materials with the idea that they can delete them if they write for a long time, and they can't add them if they write less, so they face all kinds of materials without screening and analysis, and they think that they can use all the brains that are good. Some people feel that the material is long, and it looks weighty when given to the leader, and it can also show that they have done a lot of work. Some people have long developed the habit of instigating, and they can't wait to talk about a problem from ancient times, and it seems that they are well-versed and thoughtful. In fact, the criterion for judging whether a piece of material is good or not is never the length of the article, but the ideas and logic contained in the article itself. What's more, the length of the article depends on the specific situation, and the length is not necessarily good. For example, in the work report of the "top leader" at the annual work conference, the lower-level unit is longer than the higher-level unit; It is not appropriate for the members of the leadership group to report on their work and integrity, and the deputy position is longer than the main position.
Second, the style of writing is flashy and unrealistic.
Everyone has their own style of writing and speaking, and there is nothing wrong with putting a strong style in personal works, but it should be used with caution in official documents. A colleague, when writing, all the articles are large to the summary, small to the briefing are thick and colorful, open and close, especially lyrical, just contact with the feeling of quite literary, after a long time left the leader with the impression of "too floating, too empty, not real". Articles with beautiful rhetoric and charm can indeed bring artistic enjoyment and spiritual pleasure to a certain extent, but after all, the surname of the official document material is "Gong", and the style of writing is relatively simple and solemn, which is determined by its basic attributes. It is not that a variety of literary styles cannot be used in official documents, but should be determined comprehensively according to various factors such as genre and occasion. For example, a few years ago, when I wrote a resignation speech for a deputy leader of the unit, I deliberately used some more lyrical expressions, such as, "In this land that dares to be the first, in this team full of warmth, and in this cohesive family, I insist on thinking with my heart, making decisions with my heart, and doing things with my heart, and together with my colleagues, I have poured energy and hard work into the cause, entrusted my emotions and pursuits, and paid enthusiasm and efforts." It is not only in line with the occasion of the cadre's resignation speech, but also in line with the leader's state of mind at that time, and has received good results.
3. Blind pursuit of confrontation.
The subtitle should be opposed, which is the consensus of almost all "pen sticks", and the leaders also like it. In the same way, when writing anything, you have to make a few "new", a few "insistence", a few "more", and even the number of words must be the same. On the one hand, it is convenient for readers to quickly grasp the theme and framework of the article, which is especially suitable for examinations, and on the other hand, it also has a sense of formal beauty. However, sometimes we fall into the "obsessive-compulsive disorder" of fighting, fighting for the sake of fighting, and making up some blunt and awkward expressions, for example, in order to fight against "strengthening, optimizing, and solidifying", we make up a "normalization" that has never appeared; In order to fight against "a piece of Dan heart, indomitable, and meticulous", writing a "keep persistent" that is not an idiom seems nondescript. No matter what form it takes, it's always in the service of content. Just like I have a small family during the work in the organization department, the materials of the organization department have never paid attention to the battle, and the work summary or report materials are directly "1. Grassroots party building......Second, the management of cadres ......Third, the talent team is ......"Just make the work clear.
Fourth, excessive personal creation.
There is a problem when writing materials, I like to add too many of my own ideas, ignore the comprehension and grasp of the leadership thoughts, sometimes on the basis of the leadership meaning to "add branches and leaves" and "add oil and vinegar", and there is a little pride in my heart, but the leader of the written material is not satisfied with it, and will ask rhetorically, "Is this what I mean?" "Did I say that? "The official document materials are for the service of the leader, and to put it bluntly, it is the embodiment of the leader's intention. Personally, I think that the third-class secretary records, the second-class secretary supplements, and the first-class secretary creates. For beginners, you have to learn to walk before you can learn to run. First of all, through a period of observation, pondering and practice, we should be familiar with the leader's ideas, understand the leaders' ideas, and grasp the leaders' intentions, and then the second creation on this basis. For example, the simplest way to organize the leader's speech is to suggest that beginners should try to retain the leader's original expression as much as possible, except for the word errors and confusion that must be adjusted, without making too many changes. First, to avoid misinterpretation of the meaning of the leader due to unfamiliarity; Second, through the practice of repeatedly sorting out the leader's speech, we can strengthen the comprehension of the leader's ideas.
Fifth, the expression is deceitful.
We say that official documents should also pay attention to literary style, what kind of literary style? Simple and natural style. Some people have a misunderstanding of literary brilliance, thinking that twisting and turning, and making a mystery is literary brilliance. Obviously, you can explain things clearly in one sentence, but you have to say it in one paragraph; I can tell you directly, but I have to give you a riddle. What I see most in this situation is government information, and many people like to do some strange tricks on the title of government information. "Good Day, Unforgettable Memory", I don't know that I think I am writing about my experience, but in fact, it is written about organizing newly hired personnel to carry out militarized style tempering, and directly saying that "the unit organizes newly hired personnel to carry out militarized style tempering" is not good? What is the "New Year's Flavor" in your heart? Looking at the title, I thought it was a speech, but it was actually about front-line personnel sticking to their posts during the Spring Festival and being on emergency duty, just looking at the title, who would know that it was written on this topic? In order to explain things clearly in the most concise and clear language, the official documents should be more direct and overviewed, without flashbacks and interpolations; Only use a straight pen, no curved pen; Only brief explanations, direct discussions, and less description, lyricism, and circumstance. Only in this way can we meet the overall requirements of clear, accurate, simple and solemn official language. Having said so much, it can be summed up in two points: objectively, official document materials are just a tool in the final analysis, and their role is to make things clear, so the writing of official documents should return to the truth, have something to say, make a long story short, and say it well. Subjectively, official documents are for the service of the leader, the leader says that good is good, bad is bad, and the satisfaction of the leader is the ultimate pursuit of the material writer.