On the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference, Chief Wang Yi and Blinken held a high-level dialogue between China and the United States. The two heads of state had in-depth exchanges on the development of China-US relations and major issues of concern, and Blinken once again stressed that the United States will unswervingly pursue a one-China policy and does not support "not using Taiwan to contain China." However, although Blinken's assurances are still in his ears, a set of tricks by the US team and politicians has made his promises worthless.
Kinmen, a small island off China's southeastern coast, has been a hot topic between China and the United States lately. The entry of the U.S. ** team caused an uproar in this quiet land. What's even more ironic is that when the U.S. team entered Kinmen, Blinken also made a guarantee at the Munich Security Conference: The United States is by no means a "** element, nor is it trying to contain China through Taiwan." This makes people can't help but ask, is the United States "double standard"?
The United States and political circles have made such a show, which makes people very curious, what the hell are they doing? Do they really think that a little clever trickery can make a difference in the current situation between China and the United States? Of course not. Sino-US relations cannot only rely on one or two small frictions, but also on dialogue and consultation between the two countries in order to achieve the final result.
Blinken's pledge was intended to make the U.S.-China relationship more stable and ease tensions. But now, such a promise seems so weak, so ironic. Because when Blinken promised not to support "** again, the US ** team was still secretly stumbling, which was like a resounding slap in the face, slapping him hard.
Of course, we can't completely deny that what Blinken said is just some small measures in the US and political circles. After all, promises are such things as promises, after all, they have to be fulfilled by two people together. China hopes that Blinken will match his words with his deeds and earnestly promote the steady development between China and the United States.
From the Kinmen incident, we can see the deceit of the United States and the political circles, and we can also see how weak the guarantees made by Blinken are. But this is precisely the real relationship between China and the United States. In today's society, we need to strengthen understanding and communication, strengthen cooperation, and achieve a win-win situation. Only in this way can we face all kinds of difficulties together and work together to create a better tomorrow.
At the end of our remarks, we reiterated that no matter how the US team and politicians play tricks, we will resolutely defend our core interests. We also hope that the US side will respect China's propositions and concerns and contribute to the peace and development of China and the United States. Against the backdrop of globalization today, how to properly handle the contradictions between China and the United States is not only a common issue for both sides, but also for the peace and stability of the entire international community.
All in all, although the Kinmen incident was only a small farce between China and the United States, it also reflected the complexity and challenges between China and the United States. In the relationship between China and the United States, we need to be more open-minded and pragmatic in dealing with and dealing with it. Only in this way can we write a new chapter in China-US relations and a community with a shared future for mankind.